Maserati 3200 GT
Car comparison
Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32VvsLotus Esprit 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLotus Esprit
3.5 i V8 32V Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V
- Fastest top speed290 km/h180 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Most powerful370 hp276 kW
- Highest torque491 Nm362 lb-ft
- Largest trunk220 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score75/100
- Best economy score67/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Lotus Esprit 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Lightest1,380 kg3,042 lb
- Best power-to-weight257 hp/t191 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption20.0 L/100 km11.8 mpg US14.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | LotusEsprit3.5 i V8 32V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 370hp276kW | 354hp264kW |
| Torque | 491Nm362lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,590kg3,505lb | 1,380kg3,042lb |
| Gross weight | 1,940kg4,277lb | 1,630kg3,594lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | 282 km/h 175 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.4s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated | 63.4s99% target: 279 km/h / 173 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.1s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.1s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.9s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 23.6L/100 km10mpg US12.0mpg UK | 20L/100 km11.8mpg US14.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.1s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 233hp/t174kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated | 257hp/t191kW/t116hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 309Nm/t207lb-ft/ton Calculated | 290Nm/t194lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 600km373mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,217cc196cu in | 3,506cc214cu in |
| Length | 4,510mm178in | 4,370mm172in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,880mm74in |
| Height | 1,310mm52in | 1,150mm45in |
| Wheelbase | 2,660mm105in | 2,420mm95in |
| Front track | 1,525mm60in | 1,530mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,538mm61in | 1,545mm61in |
| Trunk volume | - | 200L |
| Max trunk volume | 220L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 73L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Lotus Esprit 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 6,250 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| LotusEsprit3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | 6,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | LotusEsprit3.5 i V8 32V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.9 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.1 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.1 s | 15.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | 282 km/h 175 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.1 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.1 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 181 km/h 112 mph | 185 km/h 115 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 370 hp 276 kW |
| LotusEsprit3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | 354 hp 264 kW |
Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V has 16 hp more than Lotus Esprit 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Lotus Esprit 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo and Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V: 16 hp (12 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 491 Nm 362 lb-ft |
| LotusEsprit3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb |
| LotusEsprit3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| LotusEsprit3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | 282 km/h 175 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 5.1 s |
| LotusEsprit3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | 4.9 s |
Although Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V has more power, Lotus Esprit 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lotus Esprit 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo and Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| LotusEsprit3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | 257 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 370 hp 276 kW | 5.1 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| LotusEsprit3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | 354 hp 264 kW | 4.9 s | 282 km/h 175 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LotusEsprit3.5 i V8 32V Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | LotusEsprit3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 370 hp 276 kW | 354 hp 264 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 491 Nm 362 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.1 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | 282 km/h 175 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 600 km 373 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 220 L 7.8 cu ft | 200 L 7.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 257 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 15 L/100 km15.7 mpg US18.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 26.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 42.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,250 L594 US gal495 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,938 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V
- Has 16 hp more
- Has 91 Nm more
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Lotus Esprit 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo
- Is 210 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























