Tesla Model S · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
Tesla Model S · Facelift 2016 Long Range 100 kWhvsLotus Emeya S 102 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLotus Emeya
S 102 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Long Range 100 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.8 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque755 Nm557 lb-ft
- Lightest2,201 kg4,852 lb
- Best power-to-weight246 hp/t183 kW/t4.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk745 L
- Best overall score86/100
- Best performance score86/100
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Lotus Emeya S 102 kWh
- Most powerful612 hp456 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Long Range 100 kWh | LotusEmeyaS 102 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 541hp403kW | 612hp456kW |
| Torque | 755Nm557lb-ft | 710Nm524lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,201kg4,852lb | 2,490kg5,490lb |
| Gross weight | 2,694kg5,939lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 55.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 62.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 4.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.2s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 4.0s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 11.9s Calculated | 12.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 246hp/t183kW/t111hp/1000 lb Calculated | 246hp/t183kW/t111hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 343Nm/t230lb-ft/ton Calculated | 285Nm/t191lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 4,970mm196in | 5,139mm202in |
| Width | 1,964mm77in | 2,123mm84in |
| Height | 1,445mm57in | 1,459mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 3,069mm121in |
| Front track | 1,662mm65in | - |
| Rear track | 1,700mm67in | - |
| Ground clearance | 160mm6in | 141mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 745L | 509L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,645L | 1,388L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Long Range 100 kWh | LotusEmeyaS 102 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 4.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 4.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.2 s | 15.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 8.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.0 s | 10.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.9 s | 12.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 187 km/h 116 mph | 181 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Long Range 100 kWh | 541 hp 403 kW |
| LotusEmeyaS 102 kWh | 612 hp 456 kW |
Lotus Emeya S 102 kWh has 71 hp more than Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Long Range 100 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Long Range 100 kWh and Lotus Emeya S 102 kWh: 71 hp (53 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Long Range 100 kWh | 755 Nm 557 lb-ft |
| LotusEmeyaS 102 kWh | 710 Nm 524 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Long Range 100 kWh | 2,201 kg 4,852 lb |
| LotusEmeyaS 102 kWh | 2,490 kg 5,490 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Long Range 100 kWh | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| LotusEmeyaS 102 kWh | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Long Range 100 kWh | 3.8 s |
| LotusEmeyaS 102 kWh | 4.2 s |
Although Lotus Emeya S 102 kWh has more power, Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Long Range 100 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Long Range 100 kWh and Lotus Emeya S 102 kWh: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Long Range 100 kWh | 246 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
| LotusEmeyaS 102 kWh | 246 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Long Range 100 kWh | 541 hp 403 kW | 3.8 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| LotusEmeyaS 102 kWh | 612 hp 456 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Long Range 100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LotusEmeyaS 102 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Long Range 100 kWh | LotusEmeyaS 102 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 541 hp 403 kW | 612 hp 456 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 755 Nm 557 lb-ft | 710 Nm 524 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 4.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,201 kg 4,852 lb | 2,490 kg 5,490 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 745 L 26.3 cu ft | 509 L 18.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 246 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 246 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Long Range 100 kWh
- Has 45 Nm more
- Is 289 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 236 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Lotus Emeya S 102 kWh
- Has 71 hp more
Pros
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























