Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250vsLotus Elise (SERIES 2) 1.8 i 16V 111R
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLotus Elise (SERIES 2)
1.8 i 16V 111R
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250
- Fastest top speed244 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque310 Nm229 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption9.8 L/100 km24.0 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk225 L
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score29/100
Lotus Elise (SERIES 2) 1.8 i 16V 111R
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Lightest850 kg1,874 lb
- Best power-to-weight226 hp/t168 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Best overall score48/100
- Best performance score59/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 192hp143kW |
| Torque | 310Nm229lb-ft | 180Nm133lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,400kg3,086lb | 850kg1,874lb |
| Gross weight | 1,790kg3,946lb | - |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 79.7s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph Calculated | 49.9s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.4s Calculated | 18.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 226hp/t168kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated | 212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 822km511mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,796cc110cu in | 1,796cc110cu in |
| Length | 4,134mm163in | 3,785mm149in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,719mm68in |
| Height | 1,301mm51in | 1,143mm45in |
| Wheelbase | 2,430mm96in | 2,300mm91in |
| Front track | 1,559mm61in | 1,457mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,565mm62in | 1,503mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 225L | 115L |
| Max trunk volume | 335L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 38L |
| CO2 emissions | 169g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250: Power / Torque
- Lotus Elise (SERIES 2) 1.8 i 16V 111R: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-4,300 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R | 7,800 rpm | 6,800 rpm | 8,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.4 s | 18.0 s |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 11.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 177 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 204 hp 152 kW |
| LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R | 192 hp 143 kW |
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250 has 12 hp more than Lotus Elise (SERIES 2) 1.8 i 16V 111R.
The biggest power difference is between Lotus Elise (SERIES 2) 1.8 i 16V 111R and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250: 12 hp (9 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft |
| LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R | 180 Nm 133 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb |
| LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R | 850 kg 1,874 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 6.5 s |
| LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R | 4.9 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250 has more power, Lotus Elise (SERIES 2) 1.8 i 16V 111R is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lotus Elise (SERIES 2) 1.8 i 16V 111R and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250: 1.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R | 226 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 204 hp 152 kW | 6.5 s | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R | 192 hp 143 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 192 hp 143 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | 180 Nm 133 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb | 850 kg 1,874 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 822 km 511 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 169 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 225 L 7.9 cu ft | 115 L 4.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 226 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,916 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250
- Has 12 hp more
- Has 130 Nm more
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 110 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Lotus Elise (SERIES 2) 1.8 i 16V 111R
- Is 550 kg lighter
- Is 1.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 80 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























