Car comparison

Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380vsLexus NX I (AZ10) · Facelift 2017 300

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Kodiaq I

GT TSI380

220 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2018-2021
VS

Lexus NX I (AZ10) · Facelift 2017

300

238 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380

  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,715 kg
    3,781 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.0 L/100 km
    29.4 mpg US
    35.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.4 L/100 km
    36.8 mpg US
    44.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    775 km
    482 mi
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100

Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Most powerful
    238 hp
    177 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    133 hp/t
    99 kW/t
    7.5 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    501 L
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
Power
220hp164kW
238hp177kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,715kg3,781lb
1,787kg3,940lb
Gross weight-
2,309kg5,090lb
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
83.3s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
75.8s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.5s
7.4s
0-200 km/h
38.4s
Calculated
46.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.1s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.4s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton
Calculated
196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
775km482mi
Calculated
638km397mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,634mm182in
4,638mm183in
Width
1,883mm74in
1,869mm74in
Height
1,649mm65in
1,646mm65in
Wheelbase
2,791mm110in
2,659mm105in
Ground clearance-
175mm7in
Trunk volume
463L
501L
Max trunk volume
1,607L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
62L
60L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300PowerTorque
  • Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380: Power / Torque
  • Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI3804,500-6,200 rpm1,500-4,400 rpm6,450 rpm
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 20173004,800-5,600 rpm1,650-4,000 rpm5,850 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.1 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.5 s
7.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
38.4 s
46.4 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.4 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
147 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
220 hp
164 kW
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
238 hp
177 kW

Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300 has 18 hp more than Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380 and Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300: 18 hp (13 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
1,715 kg
3,781 lb
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
1,787 kg
3,940 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
220 km/h
137 mph
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI3807.5 s
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 20173007.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300 and Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380 and Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300: 1.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
775 km
482 mi
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
638 km
397 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
220 hp
164 kW
7.5 s
220 km/h
137 mph
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
238 hp
177 kW
7.4 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
463 L
16.4 cu ft
Length
4,634 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
501 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,638 mm
182.6 in
Height
1,646 mm
64.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
7.5 s
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
7.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
Power
220 hp
164 kW
238 hp
177 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.5 s
7.4 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,715 kg
3,781 lb
1,787 kg
3,940 lb
Fuel consumption
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
463 L
16.4 cu ft
Length
4,634 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
501 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,638 mm
182.6 in
Height
1,646 mm
64.8 in
Range score
775 km
482 mi
638 km
397 mi
Trunk score
463 L
16.4 cu ft
501 L
17.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300
Consumption8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.00 LC100 km16.45 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.53 LC100 mi26.47 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,100 LC/year2,468 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380

  • Is 72 kg lighter
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 137 km (85 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300

  • Has 18 hp more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 38 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380
Lexus NX I (AZ10) 300
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

GT TSI380
380TSI
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380vsVolkswagenTayron I380TSI
300
200t
VS
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300vsLexusNX I (AZ10)200t
GT TSI380
45 TDI
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDI
300
350h
VS
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300vsLexusNX II (AZ20)350h
GT TSI380
25d
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380vsJaguarF-Pace25d
300
450d V8
VS
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300vsLexusLX IIIFacelift 2015450d V8
GT TSI380
2.0 B5
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
300
2.0 D240
VS
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
GT TSI380
45 TDI V6
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380vsAUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6
GT TSI380
2.2 JTDM
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380vsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
300
2.0 D5
VS
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
GT TSI380
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI
Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380 vs Lexus NX I (AZ10) · Facelift 2017 300 - car comparison - FastVsFaster