Lexus NX I (AZ10) · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Lexus NX I (AZ10) · Facelift 2017 300vsLexus NX I (AZ10) 200t
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLexus NX I (AZ10)
200t
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t
- Lightest1,685 kg3,715 lb
- Best power-to-weight141 hp/t105 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.3 L/100 km22.8 mpg US27.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range779 km484 mi
- Largest trunk555 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score86/100
Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph Unrestricted200 km/h124 mph Restricted
- Most powerful238 hp177 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | LexusNX I (AZ10)200t |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 238hp177kW | 238hp177kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,837kg4,050lb | 1,685kg3,715lb |
| Gross weight | 2,359kg5,201lb | 2,295kg5,060lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 74.4s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 71.3s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 45.5s Calculated | 44.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 191Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 612km380mi Calculated | 779km484mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,638mm183in | 4,630mm182in |
| Width | 1,869mm74in | 1,845mm73in |
| Height | 1,646mm65in | 1,645mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,659mm105in | 2,660mm105in |
| Front track | - | 1,580mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,580mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 175mm7in | 185mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 501L | 555L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,600L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 178g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300: Power / Torque
- Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 4,800-5,600 rpm | 1,650-4,000 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | 4,800 rpm | 1,650 rpm | 5,700 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | LexusNX I (AZ10)200t |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 45.5 s | 44.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 238 hp 177 kW |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | 238 hp 177 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 1,837 kg 4,050 lb |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 7.2 s |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300 and Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t and Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 612 km 380 mi |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | 779 km 484 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 238 hp 177 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | 238 hp 177 kW | 7.3 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 |
| 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 238 hp 177 kW | 238 hp 177 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,837 kg 4,050 lb | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 612 km 380 mi | 779 km 484 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 178 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 501 L 17.7 cu ft | 555 L 19.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300 | Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.15 LC100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,573 LC/year | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t
- Is 152 kg lighter
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 167 km (104 mi) more estimated range
- Has 54 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























