Lexus LS IV · Facelift 2012
Car comparison
Lexus LS IV · Facelift 2012 600h V8vsLexus LS IV 460 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLexus LS IV
460 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lexus LS IV Facelift 2012 600h V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful394 hp294 kW
- Highest torque520 Nm384 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range977 km607 mi
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score68/100
- Best economy score84/100
Lexus LS IV 460 V8
- Lightest2,200 kg4,850 lb
- Best power-to-weight167 hp/t124 kW/t6.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk565 L
- Best practicality score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LexusLS IVFacelift 2012600h V8 | LexusLS IV460 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 394hp294kW | 367hp274kW |
| Torque | 520Nm384lb-ft | 469Nm346lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,390kg5,269lb | 2,200kg4,850lb |
| Gross weight | 2,765kg6,096lb | 2,640kg5,820lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 66.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 66.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.1s Calculated | 19.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK | 17.2L/100 km13.7mpg US16.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated | 167hp/t124kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated | 213Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 977km607mi Calculated | 724km450mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,969cc303cu in | 4,608cc281cu in |
| Length | 5,090mm200in | 5,030mm198in |
| Width | 1,875mm74in | 1,875mm74in |
| Height | 1,470mm58in | 1,475mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,970mm117in | 2,970mm117in |
| Front track | 1,610mm63in | 1,615mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,610mm63in | 1,620mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 420L | 565L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 84L | 84L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lexus LS IV Facelift 2012 600h V8: Power / Torque
- Lexus LS IV 460 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2012600h V8 | 6,400 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| LexusLS IV460 V8 | 6,400 rpm | 4,100 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LexusLS IVFacelift 2012600h V8 | LexusLS IV460 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.1 s | 19.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 172 km/h 107 mph | 171 km/h 106 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2012600h V8 | 394 hp 294 kW |
| LexusLS IV460 V8 | 367 hp 274 kW |
Lexus LS IV Facelift 2012 600h V8 has 27 hp more than Lexus LS IV 460 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Lexus LS IV 460 V8 and Lexus LS IV Facelift 2012 600h V8: 27 hp (20 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2012600h V8 | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft |
| LexusLS IV460 V8 | 469 Nm 346 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2012600h V8 | 2,390 kg 5,269 lb |
| LexusLS IV460 V8 | 2,200 kg 4,850 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2012600h V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| LexusLS IV460 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2012600h V8 | 6.1 s |
| LexusLS IV460 V8 | 6.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lexus LS IV Facelift 2012 600h V8 and Lexus LS IV 460 V8: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2012600h V8 | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
| LexusLS IV460 V8 | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lexus LS IV Facelift 2012 600h V8 and Lexus LS IV 460 V8: 3.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2012600h V8 | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| LexusLS IV460 V8 | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2012600h V8 | 977 km 607 mi |
| LexusLS IV460 V8 | 724 km 450 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2012600h V8 | 394 hp 294 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| LexusLS IV460 V8 | 367 hp 274 kW | 6.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2012600h V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LexusLS IV460 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2012600h V8 |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| LexusLS IV460 V8 |
| 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Lexus LS IV Facelift 2012 600h V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2012600h V8 | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| LexusLS IV460 V8 | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2012600h V8 | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
| LexusLS IV460 V8 | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LexusLS IVFacelift 2012600h V8 | LexusLS IV460 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 394 hp 294 kW | 367 hp 274 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft | 469 Nm 346 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,390 kg 5,269 lb | 2,200 kg 4,850 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 977 km 607 mi | 724 km 450 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | 565 L 20.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lexus LS IV Facelift 2012 600h V8 | Lexus LS IV 460 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK | 11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.05 LC100 km | 20.30 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi | 32.67 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal | 1,740 L460 US gal383 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,258 LC/year | 3,045 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lexus LS IV Facelift 2012 600h V8
- Has 27 hp more
- Has 51 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 3.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 253 km (157 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Lexus LS IV 460 V8
- Is 190 kg lighter
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 145 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























