Lexus LS IV
Car comparison
Lexus LS IV 460 V8vsLexus LS IV · Facelift 2012 460 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLexus LS IV · Facelift 2012
460 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lexus LS IV Facelift 2012 460 V8 370 hp
- Most powerful370 hp276 kW
- Highest torque473 Nm349 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight168 hp/t125 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption16.8 L/100 km14.0 mpg US16.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range737 km458 mi
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score67/100
Lexus LS IV 460 V8 367 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest2,200 kg4,850 lb
- Lowest highway consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Largest trunk565 L
- Best economy score76/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LexusLS IV460 V8367 hp | LexusLS IVFacelift 2012460 V8370 hp |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 367hp274kW | 370hp276kW |
| Torque | 469Nm346lb-ft | 473Nm349lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,200kg4,850lb | 2,200kg4,850lb |
| Gross weight | 2,640kg5,820lb | 2,575kg5,677lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 66.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 67.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.5s Calculated | 19.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.2L/100 km13.7mpg US16.4mpg UK | 16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 167hp/t124kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated | 168hp/t125kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 213Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 724km450mi Calculated | 737km458mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,608cc281cu in | 4,608cc281cu in |
| Length | 5,030mm198in | 5,090mm200in |
| Width | 1,875mm74in | 1,875mm74in |
| Height | 1,475mm58in | 1,465mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,970mm117in | 2,970mm117in |
| Front track | 1,615mm64in | 1,615mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,620mm64in | 1,615mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 565L | 560L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 84L | 84L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lexus LS IV 460 V8 367 hp: Power / Torque
- Lexus LS IV Facelift 2012 460 V8 370 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LexusLS IV460 V8367 hp | 6,400 rpm | 4,100 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2012460 V8370 hp | 6,400 rpm | 4,100 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LexusLS IV460 V8367 hp | LexusLS IVFacelift 2012460 V8370 hp |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.5 s | 19.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 171 km/h 106 mph | 171 km/h 106 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLS IV460 V8367 hp | 367 hp 274 kW |
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2012460 V8370 hp | 370 hp 276 kW |
Lexus LS IV Facelift 2012 460 V8 370 hp has 3 hp more than Lexus LS IV 460 V8 367 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Lexus LS IV 460 V8 367 hp and Lexus LS IV Facelift 2012 460 V8 370 hp: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLS IV460 V8367 hp | 469 Nm 346 lb-ft |
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2012460 V8370 hp | 473 Nm 349 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLS IV460 V8367 hp | 2,200 kg 4,850 lb |
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2012460 V8370 hp | 2,200 kg 4,850 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLS IV460 V8367 hp | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2012460 V8370 hp | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLS IV460 V8367 hp | 6.3 s |
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2012460 V8370 hp | 6.3 s |
Although Lexus LS IV Facelift 2012 460 V8 370 hp has more power, Lexus LS IV 460 V8 367 hp is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLS IV460 V8367 hp | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2012460 V8370 hp | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLS IV460 V8367 hp | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2012460 V8370 hp | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLS IV460 V8367 hp | 724 km 450 mi |
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2012460 V8370 hp | 737 km 458 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LexusLS IV460 V8367 hp | 367 hp 274 kW | 6.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2012460 V8370 hp | 370 hp 276 kW | 6.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LexusLS IV460 V8367 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2012460 V8370 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LexusLS IV460 V8367 hp |
| 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2012460 V8370 hp |
| 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Lexus LS IV Facelift 2012 460 V8 370 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LexusLS IV460 V8367 hp | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2012460 V8370 hp | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LexusLS IV460 V8367 hp | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2012460 V8370 hp | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LexusLS IV460 V8367 hp | LexusLS IVFacelift 2012460 V8370 hp | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 367 hp 274 kW | 370 hp 276 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 469 Nm 346 lb-ft | 473 Nm 349 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,200 kg 4,850 lb | 2,200 kg 4,850 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 724 km 450 mi | 737 km 458 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 565 L 20.0 cu ft | 560 L 19.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lexus LS IV 460 V8 367 hp | Lexus LS IV Facelift 2012 460 V8 370 hp |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK | 11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.30 LC100 km | 19.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.67 LC100 mi | 32.11 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,740 L460 US gal383 UK gal | 1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,045 LC/year | 2,993 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lexus LS IV 460 V8 367 hp
- Has 5 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Lexus LS IV Facelift 2012 460 V8 370 hp
- Has 3 hp more
- Has 4 Nm more
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 13 km (8 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























