Lexus GS IV · Facelift 2015
Car comparison
Lexus GS IV · Facelift 2015 450h V6vsVolvo S90 2.0 T6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S90
2.0 T6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lexus GS IV Facelift 2015 450h V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,860 kg4,101 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions137 g/km
- Best estimated range1,119 km695 mi
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Volvo S90 2.0 T6
- Most powerful310 hp231 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight161 hp/t120 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score65/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LexusGS IVFacelift 2015450h V6 | VolvoS902.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 292hp218kW | 310hp231kW |
| Torque | 352Nm260lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,860kg4,101lb | 1,930kg4,255lb |
| Gross weight | 2,305kg5,082lb | 2,360kg5,203lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 61.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 61.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.1s Calculated | 18.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 13.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated | 161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 189Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated | 207Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,119km695mi Calculated | 789km491mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,456cc211cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,880mm192in | 4,963mm195in |
| Width | 1,840mm72in | 1,879mm74in |
| Height | 1,455mm57in | 1,443mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,850mm112in | 2,941mm116in |
| Front track | 1,575mm62in | 1,628mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,590mm63in | 1,629mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 130mm5in | 152mm6in |
| Trunk volume | - | 500L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 137g/km | 177g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lexus GS IV Facelift 2015 450h V6: Power / Torque
- Volvo S90 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015450h V6 | 6,000 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 5,700 rpm | 2,200-5,100 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LexusGS IVFacelift 2015450h V6 | VolvoS902.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.1 s | 18.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 13.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 175 km/h 109 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015450h V6 | 292 hp 218 kW |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 310 hp 231 kW |
Volvo S90 2.0 T6 has 18 hp more than Lexus GS IV Facelift 2015 450h V6.
The biggest power difference is between Lexus GS IV Facelift 2015 450h V6 and Volvo S90 2.0 T6: 18 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015450h V6 | 352 Nm 260 lb-ft |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015450h V6 | 1,860 kg 4,101 lb |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 1,930 kg 4,255 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015450h V6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015450h V6 | 5.9 s |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 5.9 s |
Although Volvo S90 2.0 T6 has more power, Lexus GS IV Facelift 2015 450h V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015450h V6 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lexus GS IV Facelift 2015 450h V6 and Volvo S90 2.0 T6: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015450h V6 | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015450h V6 | 1,119 km 695 mi |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 789 km 491 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015450h V6 | 292 hp 218 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 310 hp 231 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015450h V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS902.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015450h V6 |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS902.0 T6 |
| 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S90 2.0 T6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015450h V6 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015450h V6 | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LexusGS IVFacelift 2015450h V6 | VolvoS902.0 T6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 292 hp 218 kW | 310 hp 231 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 352 Nm 260 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,860 kg 4,101 lb | 1,930 kg 4,255 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,119 km 695 mi | 789 km 491 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 137 g/km | 177 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lexus GS IV Facelift 2015 450h V6 | Volvo S90 2.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 13.30 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 1,995 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lexus GS IV Facelift 2015 450h V6
- Is 70 kg lighter
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 329 km (205 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 40 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
Volvo S90 2.0 T6
- Has 18 hp more
- Has 48 Nm more
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























