Car comparison

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5vsLand Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 T5

250 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2019
VS

Land Rover Range Rover Velar

D 240 2.0

240 hp1999 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0

  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,841 kg
    4,059 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    130 hp/t
    97 kW/t
    7.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.2 L/100 km
    32.7 mpg US
    39.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    154 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,034 km
    643 mi
  • Largest trunk
    673 L
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    91/100

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph Unrestricted
    210 km/h
    130 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
Power
250hp186kW
240hp179kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
500Nm369lb-ft
Curb weight
1,927kg4,248lb
1,841kg4,059lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
217 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
76.1s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
84.1s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.9s
7.3s
0-200 km/h
35.2s
Calculated
40.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.5s
Calculated
6.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.0s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton
Calculated
272Nm/t182lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
822km511mi
Calculated
1,034km643mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,688mm185in
4,803mm189in
Width
1,902mm75in
-
Height
1,658mm65in
1,665mm66in
Wheelbase
2,865mm113in
2,874mm113in
Front track
1,668mm66in
1,644mm65in
Rear track
1,673mm66in
1,663mm65in
Ground clearance
216mm9in
251mm10in
Trunk volume
505L
673L
Max trunk volume
1,432L
1,731L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
60L
CO2 emissions
169g/km
154g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0PowerTorque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T55,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm6,000 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.04,000 rpm1,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.5 s
6.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.9 s
7.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
35.2 s
40.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
217 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.6 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.0 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
147 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
240 hp
179 kW

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 has 10 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
500 Nm
369 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
1,927 kg
4,248 lb
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
1,841 kg
4,059 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
217 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T56.9 s
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.07.3 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 and Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: 1.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
822 km
511 mi
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
1,034 km
643 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW
6.9 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
240 hp
179 kW
7.3 s
217 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Length
4,803 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,665 mm
65.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
6.9 s
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
7.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
Power
250 hp
186 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.9 s
7.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,927 kg
4,248 lb
1,841 kg
4,059 lb
Fuel consumption
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Length
4,803 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,665 mm
65.6 in
Range score
822 km
511 mi
1,034 km
643 mi
CO2 score
169 g/km
154 g/km
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T5Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0
Consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.78 LC100 km10.15 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.56 LC100 mi16.33 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal870 L230 US gal191 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,916 LC/year1,523 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0

  • Has 150 Nm more
  • Is 86 kg lighter
  • Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 213 km (132 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 168 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 15 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5
Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
D 240 2.0
2.0 D240
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
D 240 2.0
2.0 D5
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
2.0 T5
25t
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsJaguarF-Pace25t
D 240 2.0
300
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0vsLexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
2.0 T5
2.0i
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
D 240 2.0
2.0 BiTDI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
2.0 T5
2.0
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
D 240 2.0
Sport 2.0 T
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0vsSubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
2.0 T5
550T
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsChevroletEquinox III550T
2.0 T5
2.0 TSI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster