Land Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
Land Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2023 3.0 D300vsMercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 350+ 100 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294)
EQE 350+ 100 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 3.0 D300
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Highest torque650 Nm479 lb-ft
- Lightest2,049 kg4,517 lb
- Best power-to-weight146 hp/t109 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk735 L
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score64/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 D300 | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350+ 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 292hp218kW |
| Torque | 650Nm479lb-ft | 565Nm417lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,049kg4,517lb | 2,355kg5,192lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,975kg6,559lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 83.5s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 69.9s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.2s Calculated | 32.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 317Nm/t212lb-ft/ton Calculated | 240Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 883km549mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,996cc183cu in | - |
| Length | 4,797mm189in | 4,863mm191in |
| Width | - | 1,940mm76in |
| Height | 1,683mm66in | 1,686mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,874mm113in | 3,030mm119in |
| Front track | 1,644mm65in | 1,650mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,663mm65in | 1,663mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 214mm8in | 181mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 735L | 520L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,798L | 1,675L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 D300 | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350+ 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.2 s | 32.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 D300 | 300 hp 224 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350+ 100 kWh | 292 hp 218 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 3.0 D300 has 8 hp more than Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 350+ 100 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 350+ 100 kWh and Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 3.0 D300: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 D300 | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350+ 100 kWh | 565 Nm 417 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 D300 | 2,049 kg 4,517 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350+ 100 kWh | 2,355 kg 5,192 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 D300 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350+ 100 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 D300 | 6.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350+ 100 kWh | 6.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 3.0 D300 and Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 350+ 100 kWh: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 D300 | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350+ 100 kWh | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 D300 | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350+ 100 kWh | 292 hp 218 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 D300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350+ 100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 D300 | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350+ 100 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 292 hp 218 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | 565 Nm 417 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,049 kg 4,517 lb | 2,355 kg 5,192 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 883 km 549 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 735 L 26.0 cu ft | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 3.0 D300 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 3.0 D300
- Has 8 hp more
- Has 85 Nm more
- Is 306 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 215 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 350+ 100 kWh
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























