Seat Tarraco
Car comparison
Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSIvsLand Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2020 2.0 P250
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2020
2.0 P250
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Fastest top speed229 km/h142 mph
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Lightest1,698 kg3,743 lb
- Best power-to-weight144 hp/t108 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score57/100
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 P250
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,065 km662 mi
- Largest trunk748 L
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245hp183kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,698kg3,743lb | 1,875kg4,134lb |
| Gross weight | 2,440kg5,379lb | - |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.0s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 81.6s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.2s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.1s Calculated | 40.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 144hp/t108kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated | 195Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 652km405mi Calculated | 1,065km662mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,735mm186in | 4,797mm189in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | - |
| Height | 1,674mm66in | 1,683mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,790mm110in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,585mm62in | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,574mm62in | 1,663mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 251mm10in |
| Trunk volume | - | 748L |
| Max trunk volume | 700L | 1,811L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 82L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 P250: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 5,250-6,500 rpm | 1,600-4,300 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 | 5,000 rpm | 1,300-4,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.9 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.2 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.1 s | 40.4 s |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 245 hp 183 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 | 250 hp 186 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 P250 has 5 hp more than Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI and Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 P250: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 1,698 kg 3,743 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 | 217 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 6.2 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 | 7.5 s |
Although Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 P250 has more power, Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI and Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 P250: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 P250 and Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 144 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 652 km 405 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 | 1,065 km 662 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.2 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.5 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 144 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp 183 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.2 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,698 kg 3,743 lb | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 652 km 405 mi | 1,065 km 662 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 700 L 24.7 cu ft | 748 L 26.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 144 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI | Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 P250 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.10 LC100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,415 LC/year | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI
- Has 5 Nm more
- Is 177 kg lighter
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 P250
- Has 5 hp more
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 413 km (256 mi) more estimated range
- Has 48 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























