Car comparison

Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSIvsLand Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2023 2.0 D200

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Tayron II

2.0 TSI

204 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

Land Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2023

2.0 D200

204 hp1997 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2023-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 D200

  • Highest torque
    430 Nm
    317 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.0 L/100 km
    33.6 mpg US
    40.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    886 km
    550 mi
  • Largest trunk
    735 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best economy score
    88/100
  • Best practicality score
    92/100

Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    224 km/h
    139 mph
  • Most powerful
    204 hp
    152 kW
  • Lightest
    1,707 kg
    3,763 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    120 hp/t
    89 kW/t
    8.4 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    50/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSILand RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200
Power
204hp152kW
204hp152kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
430Nm317lb-ft
Curb weight
1,707kg3,763lb
1,928kg4,251lb
Gross weight
2,310kg5,093lb
-
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
To 99% top speed
78.3s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
93.4s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
8.3s
0-200 km/h
34.1s
Calculated
56.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
7.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
16.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
106hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
187Nm/t125lb-ft/ton
Calculated
223Nm/t149lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
744km462mi
Calculated
886km550mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,792mm189in
4,797mm189in
Width
1,853mm73in
2,041mm80in
Height
1,666mm66in
1,683mm66in
Wheelbase
2,790mm110in
2,874mm113in
Front track
1,588mm63in
1,644mm65in
Rear track
1,578mm62in
1,663mm65in
Ground clearance-
214mm8in
Trunk volume
345L
735L
Max trunk volume
2,090L
1,798L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
58L
62L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSILand Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 D200PowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 D200: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI5,000 rpm1,500-4,400 rpm5,250 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D2003,750-4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSILand RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
7.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
8.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
34.1 s
56.1 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
13.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
16.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
204 hp
152 kW
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200
204 hp
152 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200
430 Nm
317 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
1,707 kg
3,763 lb
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200
1,928 kg
4,251 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
224 km/h
139 mph
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200
210 km/h
130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI7.4 s
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D2008.3 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI and Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 D200: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 D200 and Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI: 0.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200
106 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
744 km
462 mi
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200
886 km
550 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
204 hp
152 kW
7.4 s
224 km/h
139 mph
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200
204 hp
152 kW
8.3 s
210 km/h
130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
345 L
12.2 cu ft
Length
4,792 mm
188.7 in
Height
1,666 mm
65.6 in
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
735 L
26.0 cu ft
Length
4,797 mm
188.9 in
Height
1,683 mm
66.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
7.4 s
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
8.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200
106 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSILand RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200
Power
204 hp
152 kW
204 hp
152 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
8.3 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Lightness
1,707 kg
3,763 lb
1,928 kg
4,251 lb
Fuel consumption
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
345 L
12.2 cu ft
Length
4,792 mm
188.7 in
Height
1,666 mm
65.6 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
735 L
26.0 cu ft
Length
4,797 mm
188.9 in
Height
1,683 mm
66.3 in
Range score
744 km
462 mi
886 km
550 mi
Trunk score
345 L
12.2 cu ft
735 L
26.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
106 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSILand Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 D200
Consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.65 LC100 km12.25 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.97 LC100 mi19.71 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,048 LC/year1,838 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI

  • Is 221 kg lighter
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 D200

  • Has 110 Nm more
  • Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 142 km (88 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 390 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI
Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2.0 D200
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
380TSI
VS
VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTayron I380TSI
2.0 D200
2.0d
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200vsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
2.0 TSI
380TSI
VS
VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTayron X380TSI
2.0 D200
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200vsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI
2.0 D200
Standard Range 50 kWh
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200vsTeslaModel YStandard Range 50 kWh
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI
2.0 D200
25T
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200vsCadillacGT425T
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI
2.0 D200
2.0 TFSI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200vsAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
2.0 TSI
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)Facelift 20233.0 V6 TDI
2.0 D200
40 TFSI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TFSI
Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2023 2.0 D200 - car comparison - FastVsFaster