Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 450vsLand Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D350
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Sport III
3.0 D350
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D350
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Lightest2,360 kg5,203 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,000 km621 mi
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score68/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 450
- Fastest top speed246 km/h153 mph
- Most powerful367 hp274 kW
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 | Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D350 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 367hp274kW | 351hp262kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,385kg5,258lb | 2,360kg5,203lb |
| Gross weight | 3,230kg7,121lb | 3,220kg7,099lb |
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 91.5s99% target: 244 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 69.1s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.2s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.3s Calculated | 25.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 149hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 210Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated | 297Nm/t198lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 957km595mi Calculated | 1,000km621mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,999cc183cu in | 2,997cc183cu in |
| Length | 5,207mm205in | 4,946mm195in |
| Width | 2,030mm80in | - |
| Height | 1,838mm72in | 1,820mm72in |
| Wheelbase | 3,135mm123in | 2,997mm118in |
| Front track | 1,669mm66in | 1,702mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,692mm67in | 1,704mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 215mm8in | 281mm11in |
| Trunk volume | 355L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,400L | 1,860L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 | Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D350 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.9 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.2 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.3 s | 25.1 s |
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.3 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 162 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 | 367 hp 274 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D350 | 351 hp 262 kW |
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 450 has 16 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D350.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D350 and Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 450: 16 hp (12 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D350 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 | 2,385 kg 5,258 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D350 | 2,360 kg 5,203 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D350 | 234 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 | 6.2 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D350 | 5.9 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 450 has more power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D350 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D350 and Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 450: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D350 | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D350 and Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 450: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D350 | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 | 957 km 595 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D350 | 1,000 km 621 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 | 367 hp 274 kW | 6.2 s | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D350 | 351 hp 262 kW | 5.9 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D350 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D350 |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D350 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D350 | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D350 | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 | Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D350 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 367 hp 274 kW | 351 hp 262 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.2 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,385 kg 5,258 lb | 2,360 kg 5,203 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 957 km 595 mi | 1,000 km 621 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 355 L 12.5 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 450 | Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D350 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 14.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 2,100 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 450
- Has 16 hp more
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D350
- Has 200 Nm more
- Is 25 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 43 km (26 mi) more estimated range
- Has 95 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























