Land Rover Range Rover Sport III
Car comparison
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D350vsMercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 450 120 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296)
EQS 450 120 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D350
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed234 km/h145 mph
- Lightest2,360 kg5,203 lb
- Best power-to-weight149 hp/t111 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score68/100
- Best economy score85/100
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 450 120 kWh
- Most powerful360 hp268 kW
- Highest torque800 Nm590 lb-ft
- Largest trunk565 L
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D350 | Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450 120 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 351hp262kW | 360hp268kW |
| Torque | 700Nm516lb-ft | 800Nm590lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,360kg5,203lb | 2,730kg6,019lb |
| Gross weight | 3,220kg7,099lb | 3,375kg7,441lb |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 69.1s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated | 71.6s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 6.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.1s Calculated | 32.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 5.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 14.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 149hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 297Nm/t198lb-ft/ton Calculated | 293Nm/t196lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,000km621mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,997cc183cu in | - |
| Length | 4,946mm195in | 5,125mm202in |
| Width | - | 1,959mm77in |
| Height | 1,820mm72in | 1,718mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,997mm118in | 3,210mm126in |
| Front track | 1,702mm67in | 1,668mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,704mm67in | 1,681mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 281mm11in | 178mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 565L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,860L | 2,100L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D350 | Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450 120 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 5.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 6.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.1 s | 32.3 s |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 14.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D350 | 351 hp 262 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450 120 kWh | 360 hp 268 kW |
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 450 120 kWh has 9 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D350.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D350 and Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 450 120 kWh: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D350 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450 120 kWh | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D350 | 2,360 kg 5,203 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450 120 kWh | 2,730 kg 6,019 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D350 | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450 120 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D350 | 5.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450 120 kWh | 6.0 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 450 120 kWh has more power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D350 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D350 and Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 450 120 kWh: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D350 | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450 120 kWh | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D350 | 351 hp 262 kW | 5.9 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450 120 kWh | 360 hp 268 kW | 6.0 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D350 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450 120 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D350 | Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450 120 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 351 hp 262 kW | 360 hp 268 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 6.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,360 kg 5,203 lb | 2,730 kg 6,019 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,000 km 621 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 565 L 20.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D350 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,100 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D350
- Is 370 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 450 120 kWh
- Has 9 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Has 115 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























