Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350dvsLand Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D300
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Sport III
3.0 D300
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D300
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Most powerful301 hp224 kW
- Highest torque650 Nm479 lb-ft
- Lightest2,315 kg5,104 lb
- Best power-to-weight130 hp/t97 kW/t7.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d
- Fastest top speed227 km/h141 mph
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,111 km690 mi
- Best economy score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d | Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D300 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286hp213kW | 301hp224kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 650Nm479lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,425kg5,346lb | 2,315kg5,104lb |
| Gross weight | 3,250kg7,165lb | 3,220kg7,099lb |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 96.2s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 71.5s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.2s Calculated | 34.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 118hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 247Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated | 281Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,111km690mi Calculated | 988km614mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,925cc178cu in | 2,997cc183cu in |
| Length | 5,207mm205in | 4,946mm195in |
| Width | 1,956mm77in | - |
| Height | 1,838mm72in | 1,820mm72in |
| Wheelbase | 3,135mm123in | 2,997mm118in |
| Front track | 1,669mm66in | 1,702mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,692mm67in | 1,704mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 215mm8in | 281mm11in |
| Trunk volume | 355L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,400L | 1,860L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D300: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d | 3,400-4,600 rpm | 1,200-3,200 rpm | 4,850 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D300 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d | Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D300 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.2 s | 34.7 s |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 92 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d | 286 hp 213 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D300 | 301 hp 224 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D300 has 15 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d and Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D300: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D300 | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d | 2,425 kg 5,346 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D300 | 2,315 kg 5,104 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D300 | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d | 7.0 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D300 | 6.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D300 and Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D300 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D300 | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d | 1,111 km 690 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D300 | 988 km 614 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d | 286 hp 213 kW | 7.0 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D300 | 301 hp 224 kW | 6.6 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D300 |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D300 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D300 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D300 | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d | Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D300 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp 213 kW | 301 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,425 kg 5,346 lb | 2,315 kg 5,104 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,111 km 690 mi | 988 km 614 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 355 L 12.5 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d | Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D300 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.17 LC100 km | 14.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,126 LC/year | 2,126 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 123 km (77 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D300
- Has 15 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 110 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 95 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























