Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 350 98 kWhvsLand Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D300
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Sport III
3.0 D300
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 350 98 kWh
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Highest torque765 Nm564 lb-ft
- Largest trunk520 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D300
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Most powerful301 hp224 kW
- Lightest2,315 kg5,104 lb
- Best power-to-weight130 hp/t97 kW/t7.7 kg/hp
- Best economy score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350 98 kWh | Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D300 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 292hp218kW | 301hp224kW |
| Torque | 765Nm564lb-ft | 650Nm479lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,505kg5,523lb | 2,315kg5,104lb |
| Gross weight | 3,095kg6,823lb | 3,220kg7,099lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 71.5s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.5s Calculated | 34.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 305Nm/t204lb-ft/ton Calculated | 281Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 988km614mi Calculated |
| Displacement | - | 2,997cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,863mm191in | 4,946mm195in |
| Width | 1,940mm76in | - |
| Height | 1,686mm66in | 1,820mm72in |
| Wheelbase | 3,030mm119in | 2,997mm118in |
| Front track | 1,650mm65in | 1,702mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,663mm65in | 1,704mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 181mm7in | 281mm11in |
| Trunk volume | 520L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,675L | 1,860L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | - | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350 98 kWh | Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D300 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.5 s | 34.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350 98 kWh | 292 hp 218 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D300 | 301 hp 224 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D300 has 9 hp more than Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 350 98 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 350 98 kWh and Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D300: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350 98 kWh | 765 Nm 564 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D300 | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350 98 kWh | 2,505 kg 5,523 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D300 | 2,315 kg 5,104 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350 98 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D300 | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350 98 kWh | 6.7 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D300 | 6.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D300 and Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 350 98 kWh: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350 98 kWh | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D300 | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350 98 kWh | 292 hp 218 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D300 | 301 hp 224 kW | 6.6 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350 98 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350 98 kWh | Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D300 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 292 hp 218 kW | 301 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 765 Nm 564 lb-ft | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,505 kg 5,523 lb | 2,315 kg 5,104 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 988 km 614 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D300 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,126 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 350 98 kWh
- Has 115 Nm more
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 70 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D300
- Has 9 hp more
- Is 190 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























