Car comparison

Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 V6vsLand Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Porsche Macan I (95B)

S 3.0 V6

340 hp2997 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboSUV2014-2018
VS

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II

4.4 V8

339 hp4367 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2014-2015

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    254 km/h
    158 mph
  • Most powerful
    340 hp
    254 kW
  • Lightest
    1,865 kg
    4,112 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    182 hp/t
    136 kW/t
    5.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    212 g/km
  • Best overall score
    72/100
  • Best performance score
    66/100

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8

  • Highest torque
    700 Nm
    516 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.6 L/100 km
    27.4 mpg US
    32.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,221 km
    759 mi
  • Best economy score
    84/100
  • Best practicality score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelPorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8
Power
340hp254kW
339hp253kW
Torque
460Nm339lb-ft
700Nm516lb-ft
Curb weight
1,865kg4,112lb
2,398kg5,287lb
Gross weight
2,550kg5,622lb
-
Top speed
254 km/h
158 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
70.7s99% target: 251 km/h / 156 mph
Calculated
99.8s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.4s
6.9s
0-200 km/h
20.0s
Calculated
32.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.1s
Calculated
6.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
13.6s
Calculated
15.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
182hp/t136kW/t83hp/1000 lb
Calculated
141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton
Calculated
292Nm/t195lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
722km449mi
Calculated
1,221km759mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,997cc183cu in
4,367cc266cu in
Length
4,681mm184in
4,850mm191in
Width
1,923mm76in
1,983mm78in
Height
1,624mm64in
1,780mm70in
Wheelbase
2,807mm111in
2,923mm115in
Front track
1,655mm65in
-
Rear track
1,651mm65in
-
Trunk volume
500L
-
Max trunk volume
1,500L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
65L
105L
CO2 emissions
212g/km
229g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 V6Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8PowerTorque
  • Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V65,500-6,500 rpm1,450-5,000 rpm6,750 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8-1,750-3,500 rpm3,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricPorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.1 s
6.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.4 s
6.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
20.0 s
32.8 s
Top speed
254 km/h
158 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
5.9 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.9 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.4 s
12.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.6 s
15.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
170 km/h
106 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6
340 hp
254 kW
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8
339 hp
253 kW

Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 V6 has 1 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8 and Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 V6: 1 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6
460 Nm
339 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8
700 Nm
516 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6
1,865 kg
4,112 lb
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8
2,398 kg
5,287 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6
254 km/h
158 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V65.4 s
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V86.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 V6 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8: 1.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6
182 hp/t
136 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6
722 km
449 mi
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8
1,221 km
759 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6
340 hp
254 kW
5.4 s
254 km/h
158 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8
339 hp
253 kW
6.9 s
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6
Power
340 hp
254 kW
0-100 km/h5.4 s
Top speed
254 km/h
158 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,681 mm
184.3 in
Height
1,624 mm
63.9 in
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8
Power
339 hp
253 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,850 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6
Power
340 hp
254 kW
0-100 km/h5.4 s
Top speed
254 km/h
158 mph
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8
Power
339 hp
253 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK

Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK
5.4 s
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
6.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6
182 hp/t
136 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehiclePorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8
Power
340 hp
254 kW
339 hp
253 kW
Torque
460 Nm
339 lb-ft
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.4 s
6.9 s
Top speed
254 km/h
158 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Lightness
1,865 kg
4,112 lb
2,398 kg
5,287 lb
Fuel consumption
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,681 mm
184.3 in
Height
1,624 mm
63.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,850 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in
Range score
722 km
449 mi
1,221 km
759 mi
CO2 score
212 g/km
229 g/km
Trunk score
500 L
17.7 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
182 hp/t
136 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehiclePorsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 V6Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8
Consumption9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km15.75 LC100 km15.05 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi25.35 LC100 mi24.22 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,363 LC/year2,258 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 V6

  • Has 1 hp more
  • Is 533 kg lighter
  • Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 19 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 41 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 17 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8

  • Has 240 Nm more
  • Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 499 km (310 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 V6
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

S 3.0 V6
S 3.0 V6
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2018S 3.0 V6
4.4 V8
GL 400
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8vsMercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 400
S 3.0 V6
S 2.9 V6
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021S 2.9 V6
4.4 V8
3.0 V6 TSI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8vsVolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI
S 3.0 V6
S 4.2 diesel V8
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6vsPorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014S 4.2 diesel V8
4.4 V8
2.0 T6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
S 3.0 V6
3.0 V6
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6vsPorscheCayenne III3.0 V6
4.4 V8
GLS 400
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8vsMercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400
S 3.0 V6
3.0t V6
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6vsJaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
4.4 V8
4.2 TDI V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8vsVolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 TDI V8
S 3.0 V6
3.0 V6
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6vsPorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6
4.4 V8
3.0 V6 GDI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8vsMaseratiLevante3.0 V6 GDI
Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 V6 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster