Maserati Levante
Car comparison
Maserati Levante 3.0 V6 GDIvsLand Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Sport II
4.4 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati Levante 3.0 V6 GDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Fastest top speed251 km/h156 mph
- Most powerful350 hp261 kW
- Lightest2,109 kg4,650 lb
- Best power-to-weight166 hp/t124 kW/t6.0 kg/hp
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score66/100
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions229 g/km
- Best estimated range1,221 km759 mi
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 GDI | Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 350hp261kW | 339hp253kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,109kg4,650lb | 2,398kg5,287lb |
| Top speed | 251 km/h 156 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 77.1s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 99.8s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.0s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.6s Calculated | 32.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 166hp/t124kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 237Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated | 292Nm/t195lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 748km465mi Calculated | 1,221km759mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 4,367cc266cu in |
| Length | 5,003mm197in | 4,850mm191in |
| Width | 1,968mm77in | 1,983mm78in |
| Height | 1,679mm66in | 1,780mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 3,004mm118in | 2,923mm115in |
| Front track | 1,624mm64in | - |
| Rear track | 1,676mm66in | - |
| Trunk volume | 580L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 105L |
| CO2 emissions | 249g/km | 229g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati Levante 3.0 V6 GDI: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 GDI | 5,750 rpm | 4,500-5,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | - | 1,750-3,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 GDI | Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.7 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.0 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.6 s | 32.8 s |
| Top speed | 251 km/h 156 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 164 km/h 102 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 GDI | 350 hp 261 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | 339 hp 253 kW |
Maserati Levante 3.0 V6 GDI has 11 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8 and Maserati Levante 3.0 V6 GDI: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 GDI | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 GDI | 2,109 kg 4,650 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | 2,398 kg 5,287 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 GDI | 251 km/h 156 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 GDI | 6.0 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati Levante 3.0 V6 GDI and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 GDI | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8 and Maserati Levante 3.0 V6 GDI: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 GDI | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 GDI | 748 km 465 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | 1,221 km 759 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 GDI | 350 hp 261 kW | 6.0 s | 251 km/h 156 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | 339 hp 253 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 GDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 GDI |
| 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 GDI | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 GDI | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 GDI | Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 350 hp 261 kW | 339 hp 253 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.0 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 251 km/h 156 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,109 kg 4,650 lb | 2,398 kg 5,287 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 748 km 465 mi | 1,221 km 759 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 249 g/km | 229 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 580 L 20.5 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati Levante 3.0 V6 GDI | Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.7 L/100 km22 mpg US26.4 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.72 LC100 km | 15.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.13 LC100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,605 L424 US gal353 UK gal | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,809 LC/year | 2,258 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati Levante 3.0 V6 GDI
- Has 11 hp more
- Is 289 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
- Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8
- Has 200 Nm more
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 473 km (294 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 20 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























