Land Rover Range Rover Sport II
Car comparison
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8vsPorsche Cayenne II · Facelift 2014 3.6 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche Cayenne II · Facelift 2014
3.6 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Most powerful339 hp253 kW
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,221 km759 mi
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score84/100
Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.6 V6
- Lightest2,040 kg4,497 lb
- Best power-to-weight147 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Lowest CO2 emissions215 g/km
- Best practicality score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 339hp253kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 700Nm516lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,398kg5,287lb | 2,040kg4,497lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,810kg6,195lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 99.8s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 96.2s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.8s Calculated | 35.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 292Nm/t195lb-ft/ton Calculated | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,221km759mi Calculated | 924km574mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,367cc266cu in | 3,598cc220cu in |
| Length | 4,850mm191in | 4,855mm191in |
| Width | 1,983mm78in | 1,939mm76in |
| Height | 1,780mm70in | 1,705mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,923mm115in | 2,895mm114in |
| Front track | - | 1,655mm65in |
| Rear track | - | 1,669mm66in |
| Trunk volume | - | 670L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,780L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 105L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | 229g/km | 215g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
- Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.6 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | - | 1,750-3,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 | 6,300 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.8 s | 35.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | 339 hp 253 kW |
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 | 300 hp 224 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8 has 39 hp more than Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.6 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.6 V6 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8: 39 hp (29 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | 2,398 kg 5,287 lb |
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 | 2,040 kg 4,497 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | 6.9 s |
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 | 7.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8 and Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.6 V6: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8 and Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.6 V6: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | 1,221 km 759 mi |
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 | 924 km 574 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | 339 hp 253 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 | 300 hp 224 kW | 7.7 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 339 hp 253 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,398 kg 5,287 lb | 2,040 kg 4,497 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,221 km 759 mi | 924 km 574 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 229 g/km | 215 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 670 L 23.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8 | Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.6 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.05 LC100 km | 16.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,258 LC/year | 2,415 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8
- Has 39 hp more
- Has 300 Nm more
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 297 km (185 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.6 V6
- Is 358 kg lighter
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 14 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























