Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) · Facelift 2012
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) · Facelift 2012 GLK 350 V6vsLand Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Sport II
4.4 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) Facelift 2012 GLK 350 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed238 km/h148 mph
- Lightest1,770 kg3,902 lb
- Best power-to-weight173 hp/t129 kW/t5.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Best economy score85/100
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8
- Most powerful339 hp253 kW
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Best estimated range1,221 km759 mi
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 V6 | Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW | 339hp253kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,770kg3,902lb | 2,398kg5,287lb |
| Gross weight | 2,420kg5,335lb | - |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 77.2s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 99.8s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.6s Calculated | 32.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 173hp/t129kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated | 292Nm/t195lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 805km500mi Calculated | 1,221km759mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,498cc213cu in | 4,367cc266cu in |
| Length | 4,536mm179in | 4,850mm191in |
| Width | 1,840mm72in | 1,983mm78in |
| Height | 1,669mm66in | 1,780mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,755mm108in | 2,923mm115in |
| Front track | 1,574mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,597mm63in | - |
| Trunk volume | 450L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,550L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 105L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 229g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) Facelift 2012 GLK 350 V6: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 V6 | 6,500 rpm | 3,500-5,250 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | - | 1,750-3,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 V6 | Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.6 s | 32.8 s |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 V6 | 306 hp 228 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | 339 hp 253 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8 has 33 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) Facelift 2012 GLK 350 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) Facelift 2012 GLK 350 V6 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8: 33 hp (25 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 V6 | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 V6 | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | 2,398 kg 5,287 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 V6 | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 V6 | 6.5 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | 6.9 s |
Although Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8 has more power, Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) Facelift 2012 GLK 350 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) Facelift 2012 GLK 350 V6 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 V6 | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 V6 | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 V6 | 805 km 500 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | 1,221 km 759 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 V6 | 306 hp 228 kW | 6.5 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | 339 hp 253 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 V6 |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 V6 | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 V6 | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 V6 | Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 339 hp 253 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb | 2,398 kg 5,287 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 805 km 500 mi | 1,221 km 759 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 229 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) Facelift 2012 GLK 350 V6 | Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.35 LC100 km | 15.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,153 LC/year | 2,258 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) Facelift 2012 GLK 350 V6
- Is 628 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 32 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8
- Has 33 hp more
- Has 330 Nm more
- Has 416 km (259 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























