Car comparison

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8vsVolkswagen Touareg II (7P) · Facelift 2014 3.0 V6 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017

4.4 SDV8

339 hp4367 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2017-2020
VS

Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) · Facelift 2014

3.0 V6 TSI

320 hp2995 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticSuperchargedSUV2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    235 km/h
    146 mph Unrestricted
    225 km/h
    140 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    339 hp
    253 kW
  • Highest torque
    740 Nm
    546 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.4 L/100 km
    28.0 mpg US
    33.6 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,024 km
    636 mi
  • Largest trunk
    780 L
  • Best overall score
    73/100
  • Best performance score
    64/100
  • Best economy score
    84/100
  • Best practicality score
    93/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLand RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI
Power
339hp253kW
320hp239kW
Torque
740Nm546lb-ft
440Nm325lb-ft
Curb weight
2,443kg5,386lb
2,244kg4,947lb
Gross weight
3,200kg7,055lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Calculated
235 km/h
146 mph
To 99% top speed
93.5s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
89.5s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.9s
7.0s
0-200 km/h
31.5s
Calculated
30.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.5s
Calculated
6.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.9s
Calculated
15.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
139hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
143hp/t106kW/t65hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
303Nm/t203lb-ft/ton
Calculated
196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,024km636mi
Calculated
980km609mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,367cc266cu in
2,995cc183cu in
Length
4,879mm192in
4,801mm189in
Width-
1,940mm76in
Height
1,803mm71in
1,709mm67in
Wheelbase
2,923mm115in
2,893mm114in
Front track
1,693mm67in
-
Rear track
1,686mm66in
-
Ground clearance
278mm11in
201mm8in
Trunk volume
780L
580L
Max trunk volume
1,686L
1,642L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
86L
100L
CO2 emissions
219g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) Facelift 2014 3.0 V6 TSIPowerTorque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) Facelift 2014 3.0 V6 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV83,500 rpm1,750-2,250 rpm3,750 rpm
VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI5,700-6,500 rpm2,900-4,700 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLand RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.5 s
6.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.9 s
7.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
31.5 s
30.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Likely limited
235 km/h
146 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
9.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.5 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.9 s
15.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
152 km/h
94 mph
152 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8 has 19 hp more than Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) Facelift 2014 3.0 V6 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) Facelift 2014 3.0 V6 TSI and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8: 19 hp (14 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI
235 km/h
146 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8 and Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) Facelift 2014 3.0 V6 TSI: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8 and Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) Facelift 2014 3.0 V6 TSI: 1.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
139 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI
143 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
339 hp
253 kW
6.9 s
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI
320 hp
239 kW
7.0 s
235 km/h
146 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
Power
339 hp
253 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
780 L
27.5 cu ft
Length
4,879 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,803 mm
71.0 in
VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI
Power
320 hp
239 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
580 L
20.5 cu ft
Length
4,801 mm
189.0 in
Height
1,709 mm
67.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
Power
339 hp
253 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI
Power
320 hp
239 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
6.9 s
VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
7.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
139 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI
143 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLand RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI
Power
339 hp
253 kW
320 hp
239 kW
Torque
740 Nm
546 lb-ft
440 Nm
325 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.9 s
7.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Lightness
2,443 kg
5,386 lb
2,244 kg
4,947 lb
Fuel consumption
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
780 L
27.5 cu ft
Length
4,879 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,803 mm
71.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
580 L
20.5 cu ft
Length
4,801 mm
189.0 in
Height
1,709 mm
67.3 in
Range score
1,024 km
636 mi
980 km
609 mi
CO2 score
219 g/km
-
Trunk score
780 L
27.5 cu ft
580 L
20.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
139 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
143 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLand Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) Facelift 2014 3.0 V6 TSI
Consumption8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.70 LC100 km17.85 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.66 LC100 mi28.73 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,205 LC/year2,678 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8

  • Has 19 hp more
  • Has 300 Nm more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 43 km (27 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 200 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 SDV8
Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) 3.0 V6 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8 vs Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) · Facelift 2014 3.0 V6 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster