Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 400dvsLand Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167)

GLS 400d

330 hp2925 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2019-2023
VS

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017

4.4 SDV8

339 hp4367 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2017-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 400d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    238 km/h
    148 mph
  • Lightest
    2,430 kg
    5,357 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.1 L/100 km
    29.0 mpg US
    34.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.0 L/100 km
    23.5 mpg US
    28.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.0 L/100 km
    33.6 mpg US
    40.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,111 km
    690 mi
  • Best performance score
    65/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 400dLand RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
Power
330hp246kW
339hp253kW
Torque
700Nm516lb-ft
740Nm546lb-ft
Curb weight
2,430kg5,357lb
2,443kg5,386lb
Gross weight
3,250kg7,165lb
3,200kg7,055lb
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
89.8s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
93.5s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.3s
6.9s
0-200 km/h
28.6s
Calculated
31.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.0s
Calculated
6.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK
10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.5s
Calculated
14.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
136hp/t101kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
139hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
288Nm/t193lb-ft/ton
Calculated
303Nm/t203lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,111km690mi
Calculated
1,024km636mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,925cc178cu in
4,367cc266cu in
Length
5,207mm205in
4,879mm192in
Width
1,956mm77in
-
Height
1,838mm72in
1,803mm71in
Wheelbase
3,135mm123in
2,923mm115in
Front track
1,669mm66in
1,693mm67in
Rear track
1,692mm67in
1,686mm66in
Ground clearance
215mm8in
278mm11in
Trunk volume
355L
780L
Max trunk volume
2,400L
1,686L
Doors
5
5
Seats
7
5
Fuel tank
90L
86L
CO2 emissions-
219g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 400dLand Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8PowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 400d: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 400d3,600-4,200 rpm1,200-3,200 rpm4,450 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV83,500 rpm1,750-2,250 rpm3,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 400dLand RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.0 s
6.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.3 s
6.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
28.6 s
31.5 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.3 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.1 s
12.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.5 s
14.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
156 km/h
97 mph
152 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8 has 9 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 400d.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 400d and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8: 9 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 400d
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
740 Nm
546 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 400d
2,430 kg
5,357 lb
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
2,443 kg
5,386 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 400d
238 km/h
148 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8 has more power, Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 400d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 400d and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 400d
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 400d
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
139 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 400d
1,111 km
690 mi
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
1,024 km
636 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 400d
330 hp
246 kW
6.3 s
238 km/h
148 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
339 hp
253 kW
6.9 s
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 400d
Power
330 hp
246 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
355 L
12.5 cu ft
Length
5,207 mm
205.0 in
Height
1,838 mm
72.4 in
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
Power
339 hp
253 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
780 L
27.5 cu ft
Length
4,879 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,803 mm
71.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 400d
Power
330 hp
246 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
Power
339 hp
253 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 400d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 400d
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
6.3 s
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
6.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 400d
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
139 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 400dLand RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
Power
330 hp
246 kW
339 hp
253 kW
Torque
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
740 Nm
546 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.3 s
6.9 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Lightness
2,430 kg
5,357 lb
2,443 kg
5,386 lb
Fuel consumption
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
355 L
12.5 cu ft
Length
5,207 mm
205.0 in
Height
1,838 mm
72.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
780 L
27.5 cu ft
Length
4,879 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,803 mm
71.0 in
Range score
1,111 km
690 mi
1,024 km
636 mi
CO2 score
-
219 g/km
Trunk score
355 L
12.5 cu ft
780 L
27.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
139 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 400dLand Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8
Consumption8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.17 LC100 km14.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.81 LC100 mi23.66 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,126 LC/year2,205 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 400d

  • Is 13 kg lighter
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 87 km (54 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8

  • Has 9 hp more
  • Has 40 Nm more
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 425 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 400d
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 SDV8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 400d vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster