Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 3.0 P400vsMercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 500 100 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294)
EQE 500 100 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 500 100 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Most powerful408 hp304 kW
- Highest torque858 Nm633 lb-ft
- Largest trunk520 L
- Best overall score77/100
- Best performance score73/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 P400
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Lightest2,210 kg4,872 lb
- Best power-to-weight181 hp/t135 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Best economy score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P400 | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 500 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400hp298kW | 408hp304kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 858Nm633lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,210kg4,872lb | 2,485kg5,478lb |
| Gross weight | 3,175kg7,000lb | 3,095kg6,823lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 71.8s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 47.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.3s Calculated | 23.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 4.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 13.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 181hp/t135kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated | 164hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 249Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated | 345Nm/t231lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,130km702mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,996cc183cu in | - |
| Length | 4,879mm192in | 4,863mm191in |
| Width | - | 1,940mm76in |
| Height | 1,803mm71in | 1,686mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,923mm115in | 3,030mm119in |
| Front track | 1,692mm67in | 1,650mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,686mm66in | 1,663mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 278mm11in | 181mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 221L | 520L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,686L | 1,675L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 104L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P400 | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 500 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 4.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.3 s | 23.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 11.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 13.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 161 km/h 100 mph | 169 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P400 | 400 hp 298 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 500 100 kWh | 408 hp 304 kW |
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 500 100 kWh has 8 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 P400.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 P400 and Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 500 100 kWh: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P400 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 500 100 kWh | 858 Nm 633 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P400 | 2,210 kg 4,872 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 500 100 kWh | 2,485 kg 5,478 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P400 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 500 100 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P400 | 5.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 500 100 kWh | 4.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 500 100 kWh and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 P400: 1.0 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P400 | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 500 100 kWh | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P400 | 400 hp 298 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 500 100 kWh | 408 hp 304 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P400 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 500 100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P400 | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 500 100 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp 298 kW | 408 hp 304 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 858 Nm 633 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,210 kg 4,872 lb | 2,485 kg 5,478 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,130 km 702 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 221 L 7.8 cu ft | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 P400 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,415 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 P400
- Is 275 kg lighter
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 500 100 kWh
- Has 8 hp more
- Has 308 Nm more
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 299 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























