Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017
3.0 P400
400 hp2996 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2019-2022
Car comparison
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 3.0 P400vsJaguar I-Pace EV400 90 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
Jaguar I-Pace
EV400 90 kWh
400 hpElectricAWDAutomaticSUV2018-2023
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar I-Pace EV400 90 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.8 s
- Highest torque696 Nm513 lb-ft
- Lightest2,133 kg4,702 lb
- Best power-to-weight188 hp/t140 kW/t5.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score76/100
- Best performance score72/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 P400
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Most powerful400 hp298 kW
- Best economy score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P400 | JaguarI-PaceEV400 90 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400hp298kW | 400hp298kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 696Nm513lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,210kg4,872lb | 2,133kg4,702lb |
| Gross weight | 3,175kg7,000lb | 2,670kg5,886lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 78.6s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 42.5s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 4.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.7s Calculated | 26.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 4.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 13.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 181hp/t135kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated | 188hp/t140kW/t85hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 249Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated | 326Nm/t218lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,130km702mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,996cc183cu in | - |
| Length | 4,879mm192in | 4,682mm184in |
| Width | 2,073mm82in | 2,011mm79in |
| Height | 1,803mm71in | 1,565mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,923mm115in | 2,990mm118in |
| Front track | 1,692mm67in | 1,643mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,686mm66in | 1,662mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 278mm11in | 174mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 221L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,686L | 1,163L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 104L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P400 | JaguarI-PaceEV400 90 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 4.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 4.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.7 s | 26.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 11.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 13.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 168 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P400 | 400 hp 298 kW |
| JaguarI-PaceEV400 90 kWh | 400 hp 298 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P400 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| JaguarI-PaceEV400 90 kWh | 696 Nm 513 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P400 | 2,210 kg 4,872 lb |
| JaguarI-PaceEV400 90 kWh | 2,133 kg 4,702 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P400 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| JaguarI-PaceEV400 90 kWh | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P400 | 5.9 s |
| JaguarI-PaceEV400 90 kWh | 4.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar I-Pace EV400 90 kWh and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 P400: 1.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P400 | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| JaguarI-PaceEV400 90 kWh | 188 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P400 | 400 hp 298 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| JaguarI-PaceEV400 90 kWh | 400 hp 298 kW | 4.8 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P400 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarI-PaceEV400 90 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P400 | JaguarI-PaceEV400 90 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp 298 kW | 400 hp 298 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 696 Nm 513 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 4.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,210 kg 4,872 lb | 2,133 kg 4,702 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,130 km 702 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 221 L 7.8 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 188 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 P400 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,415 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 P400
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar I-Pace EV400 90 kWh
- Has 146 Nm more
- Is 77 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 284 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 3.0 P400
Jaguar I-Pace EV400 90 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected
Popular comparisons
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P400vsAUDIe-tron55 95 kWh
JaguarI-PaceEV400 90 kWhvsJaguarI-PaceFacelift 2023EV400 90 kWh
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P400vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P400vsBMWX7 (G07)M50d
JaguarI-PaceEV400 90 kWhvsJaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P400vsAUDIQ8 e-tron55 114 kWh
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P400vsAUDIQ8 e-tron Sportback55 114 kWh
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P400vsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)4.0 V8 TDI
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P400vsTeslaModel XLong Range 100 kWh
JaguarI-PaceEV400 90 kWhvsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 500 100 kWh
JaguarI-PaceEV400 90 kWhvsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021S 2.9 V6
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P400vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2018GTS 2.9 V6