Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 350+ 100 kWhvsLand Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 3.0 D300
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017
3.0 D300
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D300
- Most powerful301 hp224 kW
- Highest torque650 Nm479 lb-ft
- Lightest2,203 kg4,857 lb
- Best power-to-weight137 hp/t102 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk780 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score93/100
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 350+ 100 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Best performance score59/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350+ 100 kWh | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D300 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 292hp218kW | 301hp224kW |
| Torque | 565Nm417lb-ft | 650Nm479lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,355kg5,192lb | 2,203kg4,857lb |
| Gross weight | 2,975kg6,559lb | 3,100kg6,834lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 69.9s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 84.5s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.9s Calculated | 43.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 240Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated | 295Nm/t197lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 1,036km644mi Calculated |
| Displacement | - | 2,997cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,863mm191in | 4,879mm192in |
| Width | 1,940mm76in | - |
| Height | 1,686mm66in | 1,803mm71in |
| Wheelbase | 3,030mm119in | 2,923mm115in |
| Front track | 1,650mm65in | 1,692mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,663mm65in | 1,686mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 181mm7in | 278mm11in |
| Trunk volume | 520L | 780L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,675L | 1,686L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | - | 86L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350+ 100 kWh | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D300 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.9 s | 43.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350+ 100 kWh | 292 hp 218 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D300 | 301 hp 224 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D300 has 9 hp more than Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 350+ 100 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 350+ 100 kWh and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D300: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350+ 100 kWh | 565 Nm 417 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D300 | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350+ 100 kWh | 2,355 kg 5,192 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D300 | 2,203 kg 4,857 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350+ 100 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D300 | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350+ 100 kWh | 6.7 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D300 | 7.3 s |
Although Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D300 has more power, Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 350+ 100 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 350+ 100 kWh and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D300: 0.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350+ 100 kWh | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D300 | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350+ 100 kWh | 292 hp 218 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D300 | 301 hp 224 kW | 7.3 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350+ 100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350+ 100 kWh | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D300 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 292 hp 218 kW | 301 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 565 Nm 417 lb-ft | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,355 kg 5,192 lb | 2,203 kg 4,857 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 1,036 km 644 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | 780 L 27.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D300 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,179 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 350+ 100 kWh
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D300
- Has 9 hp more
- Has 85 Nm more
- Is 152 kg lighter
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 260 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























