AUDI Q6
Car comparison
AUDI Q6 50 TFSI V6vsLand Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 3.0 D300
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017
3.0 D300
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D300
- Most powerful301 hp224 kW
- Highest torque650 Nm479 lb-ft
- Lightest2,203 kg4,857 lb
- Best power-to-weight137 hp/t102 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,036 km644 mi
- Largest trunk780 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score93/100
AUDI Q6 50 TFSI V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph Unrestricted207 km/h129 mph Restricted
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ650 TFSI V6 | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D300 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 299hp223kW | 301hp224kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 650Nm479lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,280kg5,027lb | 2,203kg4,857lb |
| Gross weight | 2,780kg6,129lb | 3,100kg6,834lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 84.5s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 84.5s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 43.2s Calculated | 43.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.3L/100 km22.9mpg US27.6mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 219Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated | 295Nm/t197lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 683km424mi Calculated | 1,036km644mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,492cc152cu in | 2,997cc183cu in |
| Length | 5,099mm201in | 4,879mm192in |
| Width | 2,014mm79in | - |
| Height | 1,784mm70in | 1,803mm71in |
| Wheelbase | 2,980mm117in | 2,923mm115in |
| Front track | 1,704mm67in | 1,692mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,721mm68in | 1,686mm66in |
| Ground clearance | - | 278mm11in |
| Trunk volume | 286L | 780L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,398L | 1,686L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 6 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 86L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ650 TFSI V6 | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D300 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 43.2 s | 43.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ650 TFSI V6 | 299 hp 223 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D300 | 301 hp 224 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D300 has 2 hp more than AUDI Q6 50 TFSI V6.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q6 50 TFSI V6 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D300: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ650 TFSI V6 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D300 | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ650 TFSI V6 | 2,280 kg 5,027 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D300 | 2,203 kg 4,857 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ650 TFSI V6 | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D300 | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ650 TFSI V6 | 7.3 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D300 | 7.3 s |
Although Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D300 has more power, AUDI Q6 50 TFSI V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ650 TFSI V6 | 10.3 L/100 km 22.9 mpg US 27.6 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D300 | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D300 and AUDI Q6 50 TFSI V6: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ650 TFSI V6 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D300 | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ650 TFSI V6 | 683 km 424 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D300 | 1,036 km 644 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ650 TFSI V6 | 299 hp 223 kW | 7.3 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D300 | 301 hp 224 kW | 7.3 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ650 TFSI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ650 TFSI V6 |
| 10.3 L/100 km 22.9 mpg US 27.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D300 |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D300 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ650 TFSI V6 | 10.3 L/100 km 22.9 mpg US 27.6 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D300 | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ650 TFSI V6 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 10.3 L/100 km 22.9 mpg US 27.6 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D300 | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ650 TFSI V6 | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D300 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 299 hp 223 kW | 301 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,280 kg 5,027 lb | 2,203 kg 4,857 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.3 L/100 km 22.9 mpg US 27.6 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 683 km 424 mi | 1,036 km 644 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 286 L 10.1 cu ft | 780 L 27.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q6 50 TFSI V6 | Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D300 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.3 L/100 km22.9 mpg US27.6 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.94 LC100 km | 14.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.87 LC100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,538 L406 US gal338 UK gal | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,691 LC/year | 2,179 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q6 50 TFSI V6
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D300
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 77 kg lighter
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 353 km (219 mi) more estimated range
- Has 494 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























