Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 98 kWhvsLand Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 3.0 D250

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294)

EQE 300 98 kWh

245 hpElectricRWDAutomaticSUV2023-2023
VS

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017

3.0 D250

249 hp2997 ccDieselAWDAutomaticSUV2020-2022

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 98 kWh

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph Unrestricted
    210 km/h
    130 mph Restricted
  • Largest trunk
    520 L
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWhLand RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
Power
245hp183kW
249hp186kW
Torque
550Nm406lb-ft
600Nm443lb-ft
Curb weight
2,385kg5,258lb
2,203kg4,857lb
Gross weight
2,975kg6,559lb
3,230kg7,121lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
83.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
103.7s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.6s
8.5s
0-200 km/h
38.5s
Calculated
52.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.2s
Calculated
8.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.5s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb
Calculated
113hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
231Nm/t154lb-ft/ton
Calculated
272Nm/t182lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
1,117km694mi
Calculated
Displacement-
2,997cc183cu in
Length
4,863mm191in
4,879mm192in
Width
1,940mm76in
-
Height
1,685mm66in
1,803mm71in
Wheelbase
3,030mm119in
2,923mm115in
Front track
1,654mm65in
1,692mm67in
Rear track
1,659mm65in
1,686mm66in
Ground clearance
181mm7in
278mm11in
Trunk volume
520L
221L
Max trunk volume
1,675L
1,686L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Fuel tank-
86L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWhLand RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.2 s
8.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.6 s
8.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
38.5 s
52.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.5 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
139 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D250 has 4 hp more than Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 98 kWh.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 98 kWh and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D250: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWh
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D250 has more power, Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 98 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 98 kWh and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D250: 0.9 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWh
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
113 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWh
245 hp
183 kW
7.6 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
249 hp
186 kW
8.5 s
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWh
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
520 L
18.4 cu ft
Length
4,863 mm
191.5 in
Height
1,685 mm
66.3 in
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
Power
249 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
221 L
7.8 cu ft
Length
4,879 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,803 mm
71.0 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWhLand RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
Power
245 hp
183 kW
249 hp
186 kW
Torque
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.6 s
8.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
Lightness
2,385 kg
5,258 lb
2,203 kg
4,857 lb
Fuel consumption
-
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
520 L
18.4 cu ft
Length
4,863 mm
191.5 in
Height
1,685 mm
66.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
221 L
7.8 cu ft
Length
4,879 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,803 mm
71.0 in
Range score
-
1,117 km
694 mi
Trunk score
520 L
18.4 cu ft
221 L
7.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
113 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLand Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D250
Consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.48 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.69 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,021 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 98 kWh

  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 299 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 98 kWh
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 3.0 D250
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 98 kWh vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 3.0 D250 - car comparison - FastVsFaster