Tesla Model Y
Car comparison
Tesla Model Y Standard Range 60 kWhvsLand Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 2.0 P300
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017
2.0 P300
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Tesla Model Y Standard Range 60 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph Unrestricted217 km/h135 mph Restricted
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Lightest1,909 kg4,209 lb
- Best power-to-weight157 hp/t117 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk854 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score59/100
- Best practicality score91/100
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300
- Most powerful301 hp224 kW
- Best economy score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | TeslaModel YStandard Range 60 kWh | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 299hp223kW | 301hp224kW |
| Torque | 420Nm310lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,909kg4,209lb | 2,076kg4,577lb |
| Gross weight | 2,549kg5,620lb | 3,000kg6,614lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 217 km/h135 mph Calculated | 201 km/h 125 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 64.8s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 79.8s99% target: 199 km/h / 124 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.0s Calculated | 95.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 1,083km673mi Calculated |
| Displacement | - | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,751mm187in | 4,879mm192in |
| Width | 1,921mm76in | 2,073mm82in |
| Height | 1,624mm64in | 1,803mm71in |
| Wheelbase | 2,890mm114in | 2,923mm115in |
| Front track | 1,646mm65in | 1,692mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,636mm64in | 1,686mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 172mm7in | 278mm11in |
| Trunk volume | 854L | 221L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,158L | 1,686L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | - | 104L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | TeslaModel YStandard Range 60 kWh | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.0 s | 95.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 217 km/h135 mph Likely limited | 201 km/h 125 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 97 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel YStandard Range 60 kWh | 299 hp 223 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300 | 301 hp 224 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300 has 2 hp more than Tesla Model Y Standard Range 60 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Tesla Model Y Standard Range 60 kWh and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel YStandard Range 60 kWh | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel YStandard Range 60 kWh | 1,909 kg 4,209 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300 | 2,076 kg 4,577 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel YStandard Range 60 kWh | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 217 km/h135 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300 | 201 km/h 125 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel YStandard Range 60 kWh | 6.9 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300 | 7.3 s |
Although Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300 has more power, Tesla Model Y Standard Range 60 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Tesla Model Y Standard Range 60 kWh and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel YStandard Range 60 kWh | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300 | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| TeslaModel YStandard Range 60 kWh | 299 hp 223 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 217 km/h135 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300 | 301 hp 224 kW | 7.3 s | 201 km/h 125 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TeslaModel YStandard Range 60 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | TeslaModel YStandard Range 60 kWh | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 299 hp 223 kW | 301 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 217 km/h135 mph | 201 km/h 125 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,909 kg 4,209 lb | 2,076 kg 4,577 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 1,083 km 673 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 854 L 30.2 cu ft | 221 L 7.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,520 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Tesla Model Y Standard Range 60 kWh
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 167 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 24 km/h (15 mph) higher top speed
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 633 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300
- Has 2 hp more
Pros
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























