Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350dvsLand Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 2.0 P300

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167)

GLS 350d

286 hp2925 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2019-2023
VS

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017

2.0 P300

301 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2019-2022

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    227 km/h
    141 mph
  • Highest torque
    600 Nm
    443 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.1 L/100 km
    29.0 mpg US
    34.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.0 L/100 km
    23.5 mpg US
    28.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.9 L/100 km
    34.1 mpg US
    40.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,111 km
    690 mi
  • Largest trunk
    355 L
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    58/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350dLand RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300
Power
286hp213kW
301hp224kW
Torque
600Nm443lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
2,425kg5,346lb
2,076kg4,577lb
Gross weight
3,250kg7,165lb
3,000kg6,614lb
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
201 km/h
125 mph
To 99% top speed
96.2s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph
Calculated
73.2s99% target: 199 km/h / 124 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.0s
7.3s
0-200 km/h
36.2s
Calculated
86.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.6s
Calculated
6.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK
12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.1s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
118hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
247Nm/t166lb-ft/ton
Calculated
193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,111km690mi
Calculated
1,083km673mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,925cc178cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
5,207mm205in
4,879mm192in
Width
1,956mm77in
-
Height
1,838mm72in
1,803mm71in
Wheelbase
3,135mm123in
2,923mm115in
Front track
1,669mm66in
1,692mm67in
Rear track
1,692mm67in
1,686mm66in
Ground clearance
215mm8in
278mm11in
Trunk volume
355L
221L
Max trunk volume
2,400L
1,686L
Doors
5
5
Seats
7
7
Fuel tank
90L
104L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350dLand Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300PowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d3,400-4,600 rpm1,200-3,200 rpm4,850 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P3005,500 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350dLand RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.6 s
6.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.0 s
7.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
36.2 s
86.8 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
201 km/h
125 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.6 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.1 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
149 km/h
92 mph
145 km/h
90 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300 has 15 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300: 15 hp (11 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d
2,425 kg
5,346 lb
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300
2,076 kg
4,577 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d
227 km/h
141 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300
201 km/h
125 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300 has more power, Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300: 1.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d
1,111 km
690 mi
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300
1,083 km
673 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d
286 hp
213 kW
7.0 s
227 km/h
141 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300
301 hp
224 kW
7.3 s
201 km/h
125 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d
Power
286 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
355 L
12.5 cu ft
Length
5,207 mm
205.0 in
Height
1,838 mm
72.4 in
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300
Power
301 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
201 km/h
125 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
221 L
7.8 cu ft
Length
4,879 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,803 mm
71.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d
Power
286 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300
Power
301 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
201 km/h
125 mph
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
7.0 s
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
7.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350dLand RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300
Power
286 hp
213 kW
301 hp
224 kW
Torque
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.0 s
7.3 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
201 km/h
125 mph
Lightness
2,425 kg
5,346 lb
2,076 kg
4,577 lb
Fuel consumption
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
355 L
12.5 cu ft
Length
5,207 mm
205.0 in
Height
1,838 mm
72.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
221 L
7.8 cu ft
Length
4,879 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,803 mm
71.0 in
Range score
1,111 km
690 mi
1,083 km
673 mi
Trunk score
355 L
12.5 cu ft
221 L
7.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350dLand Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300
Consumption8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.17 LC100 km16.80 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.81 LC100 mi27.04 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,126 LC/year2,520 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d

  • Has 200 Nm more
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 26 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 28 km (17 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 134 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 2.0 P300
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 2.0 P300 - car comparison - FastVsFaster