Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 350+ 100 kWhvsLand Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 2.0 P300
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017
2.0 P300
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 350+ 100 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Highest torque565 Nm417 lb-ft
- Largest trunk520 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score59/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300
- Most powerful301 hp224 kW
- Lightest2,076 kg4,577 lb
- Best power-to-weight145 hp/t108 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Best economy score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350+ 100 kWh | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 292hp218kW | 301hp224kW |
| Torque | 565Nm417lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,355kg5,192lb | 2,076kg4,577lb |
| Gross weight | 2,975kg6,559lb | 3,000kg6,614lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 201 km/h 125 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 69.9s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 73.2s99% target: 199 km/h / 124 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.9s Calculated | 86.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 240Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 1,083km673mi Calculated |
| Displacement | - | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,863mm191in | 4,879mm192in |
| Width | 1,940mm76in | - |
| Height | 1,686mm66in | 1,803mm71in |
| Wheelbase | 3,030mm119in | 2,923mm115in |
| Front track | 1,650mm65in | 1,692mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,663mm65in | 1,686mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 181mm7in | 278mm11in |
| Trunk volume | 520L | 221L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,675L | 1,686L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | - | 104L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350+ 100 kWh | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.9 s | 86.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 201 km/h 125 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350+ 100 kWh | 292 hp 218 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300 | 301 hp 224 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300 has 9 hp more than Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 350+ 100 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 350+ 100 kWh and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350+ 100 kWh | 565 Nm 417 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350+ 100 kWh | 2,355 kg 5,192 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300 | 2,076 kg 4,577 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350+ 100 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300 | 201 km/h 125 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350+ 100 kWh | 6.7 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300 | 7.3 s |
Although Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300 has more power, Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 350+ 100 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 350+ 100 kWh and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300: 0.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350+ 100 kWh | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300 | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350+ 100 kWh | 292 hp 218 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300 | 301 hp 224 kW | 7.3 s | 201 km/h 125 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350+ 100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350+ 100 kWh | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 292 hp 218 kW | 301 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 565 Nm 417 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 201 km/h 125 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,355 kg 5,192 lb | 2,076 kg 4,577 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 1,083 km 673 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | 221 L 7.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,520 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 350+ 100 kWh
- Has 165 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 19 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 299 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300
- Has 9 hp more
- Is 279 kg lighter
- Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























