Land Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Land Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017 5.0 V8vsMercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 580 120 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296)
EQS 580 120 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Lightest2,383 kg5,254 lb
- Best power-to-weight220 hp/t164 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk900 L
- Best economy score73/100
- Best practicality score93/100
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 580 120 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Most powerful544 hp406 kW
- Highest torque858 Nm633 lb-ft
- Best overall score81/100
- Best performance score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 120 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 525hp391kW | 544hp406kW |
| Torque | 625Nm461lb-ft | 858Nm633lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,383kg5,254lb | 2,735kg6,030lb |
| Gross weight | - | 3,375kg7,441lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 61.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 47.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.4s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.2s Calculated | 22.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.9L/100 km13.1mpg US15.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 220hp/t164kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated | 199hp/t148kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 262Nm/t175lb-ft/ton Calculated | 314Nm/t210lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 815km506mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 5,000cc305cu in | - |
| Length | 5,000mm197in | 5,125mm202in |
| Width | - | 1,959mm77in |
| Height | 1,869mm74in | 1,718mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,922mm115in | 3,210mm126in |
| Front track | 1,693mm67in | 1,668mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,685mm66in | 1,661mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 220mm9in | 178mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 900L | 565L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 2,100L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 104L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 294g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 120 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.4 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.2 s | 22.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.4 s | 10.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 170 km/h 106 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 525 hp 391 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 120 kWh | 544 hp 406 kW |
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 580 120 kWh has 19 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 580 120 kWh: 19 hp (14 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 625 Nm 461 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 120 kWh | 858 Nm 633 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 2,383 kg 5,254 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 120 kWh | 2,735 kg 6,030 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 120 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 5.4 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 120 kWh | 4.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 580 120 kWh and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8: 0.8 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 120 kWh | 199 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 525 hp 391 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 120 kWh | 544 hp 406 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 120 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 120 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 525 hp 391 kW | 544 hp 406 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 625 Nm 461 lb-ft | 858 Nm 633 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.4 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,383 kg 5,254 lb | 2,735 kg 6,030 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 815 km 506 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 294 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 900 L 31.8 cu ft | 565 L 20.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 199 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.7 L/100 km18.5 mpg US22.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.22 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 35.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,905 L503 US gal419 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,334 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8
- Is 352 kg lighter
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 335 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 580 120 kWh
- Has 19 hp more
- Has 233 Nm more
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























