Car comparison

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5vsLand Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017 3.0 D250

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 B5

235 hp1969 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2019-2021
VS

Land Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017

3.0 D250

249 hp2997 ccDieselAWDAutomaticSUV2020-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph
  • Lightest
    1,950 kg
    4,299 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    121 hp/t
    90 kW/t
    8.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,203 km
    748 mi
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoXC60 II2.0 B5Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250
Power
235hp175kW
249hp186kW
Torque
480Nm354lb-ft
600Nm443lb-ft
Curb weight
1,950kg4,299lb
2,275kg5,016lb
Gross weight-
3,150kg6,945lb
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
79.9s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
119.4s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.1s
8.6s
0-200 km/h
36.7s
Calculated
58.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.7s
Calculated
8.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.1s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
109hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
246Nm/t165lb-ft/ton
Calculated
264Nm/t176lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,203km748mi
Calculated
1,089km676mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
2,997cc183cu in
Length
4,688mm185in
5,000mm197in
Width
1,902mm75in
2,073mm82in
Height
1,658mm65in
1,869mm74in
Wheelbase
2,865mm113in
2,922mm115in
Front track
1,668mm66in
1,693mm67in
Rear track
1,673mm66in
1,685mm66in
Ground clearance
216mm9in
297mm12in
Trunk volume
505L
900L
Max trunk volume
1,432L
2,190L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
71L
86L
CO2 emissions
155g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D250PowerTorque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D250: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B54,000 rpm1,740-2,280 rpm5,000 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D2504,000 rpm1,250-2,250 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoXC60 II2.0 B5Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.7 s
8.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.1 s
8.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
36.7 s
58.0 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.7 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.1 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
150 km/h
93 mph
137 km/h
85 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
235 hp
175 kW
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250
249 hp
186 kW

Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D250 has 14 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D250: 14 hp (10 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
480 Nm
354 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250
600 Nm
443 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
1,950 kg
4,299 lb
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250
2,275 kg
5,016 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
220 km/h
137 mph
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B57.1 s
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D2508.6 s

Although Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D250 has more power, Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D250: 1.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D250: 2.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250
109 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
1,203 km
748 mi
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250
1,089 km
676 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
235 hp
175 kW
7.1 s
220 km/h
137 mph
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250
249 hp
186 kW
8.6 s
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
Power
235 hp
175 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250
Power
249 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
900 L
31.8 cu ft
Length
5,000 mm
196.9 in
Height
1,869 mm
73.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
Power
235 hp
175 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250
Power
249 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
7.1 s
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
8.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250
109 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoXC60 II2.0 B5Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250
Power
235 hp
175 kW
249 hp
186 kW
Torque
480 Nm
354 lb-ft
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.1 s
8.6 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,950 kg
4,299 lb
2,275 kg
5,016 lb
Fuel consumption
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
900 L
31.8 cu ft
Length
5,000 mm
196.9 in
Height
1,869 mm
73.6 in
Range score
1,203 km
748 mi
1,089 km
676 mi
CO2 score
155 g/km
-
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
900 L
31.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
109 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo XC60 II 2.0 B5Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D250
Consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.33 LC100 km13.83 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.62 LC100 mi22.25 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used885 L234 US gal195 UK gal1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,549 LC/year2,074 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5

  • Is 325 kg lighter
  • Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 115 km (71 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5
Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 D250
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 B5
2.0 D5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
3.0 D250
650T
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250vsChevroletBlazer650T
2.0 B5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
3.0 D250
2.0i
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 B5
25d
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5vsJaguarF-Pace25d
3.0 D250
2.0 TSI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250vsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
2.0 B5
380TSI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5vsVolkswagenTayron I380TSI
2.0 B5
45 TDI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDI
3.0 D250
40 TFSI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250vsAUDIQ640 TFSI
2.0 B5
45 TDI V6
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5vsAUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6
3.0 D250
380TSI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250vsVolkswagenTeramontFacelift 2021380TSI
2.0 B5
2.0 D240
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5 vs Land Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017 3.0 D250 - car comparison - FastVsFaster