Volkswagen Touareg III (CR)
Car comparison
Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSIvsLand Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017 3.0 D250
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017
3.0 D250
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed229 km/h142 mph
- Most powerful252 hp188 kW
- Lightest2,029 kg4,473 lb
- Best power-to-weight124 hp/t93 kW/t8.1 kg/hp
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score54/100
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D250
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,089 km676 mi
- Largest trunk900 L
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252hp188kW | 249hp186kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,029kg4,473lb | 2,275kg5,016lb |
| Gross weight | - | 3,150kg6,945lb |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 85.8s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 105.3s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.4s Calculated | 53.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 109hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated | 264Nm/t176lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 833km518mi Calculated | 1,089km676mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,997cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,878mm192in | 5,000mm197in |
| Width | 1,984mm78in | - |
| Height | 1,717mm68in | 1,869mm74in |
| Wheelbase | 2,899mm114in | 2,922mm115in |
| Front track | 1,669mm66in | 1,693mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,685mm66in | 1,685mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 215mm8in | 297mm12in |
| Trunk volume | 810L | 900L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,800L | 2,190L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 86L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D250: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,600-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250 | 4,000 rpm | 1,250-2,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.4 s | 53.0 s |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 95 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 252 hp 188 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250 | 249 hp 186 kW |
Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI has 3 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D250.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D250 and Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 2,029 kg 4,473 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250 | 2,275 kg 5,016 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250 | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 6.8 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250 | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D250: 1.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D250 and Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250 | 109 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 833 km 518 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250 | 1,089 km 676 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 252 hp 188 kW | 6.8 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250 | 249 hp 186 kW | 8.6 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI |
| 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250 |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250 | 109 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp 188 kW | 249 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,029 kg 4,473 lb | 2,275 kg 5,016 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 833 km 518 mi | 1,089 km 676 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 810 L 28.6 cu ft | 900 L 31.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 109 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI | Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D250 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.75 LC100 km | 13.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,363 LC/year | 2,074 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI
- Has 3 hp more
- Is 246 kg lighter
- Is 1.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D250
- Has 230 Nm more
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 255 km (159 mi) more estimated range
- Has 90 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























