Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 98 kWhvsLand Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017 3.0 D250
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017
3.0 D250
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D250
- Most powerful249 hp186 kW
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Lightest2,275 kg5,016 lb
- Best power-to-weight109 hp/t82 kW/t9.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk900 L
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score93/100
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 98 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score54/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWh | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245hp183kW | 249hp186kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,385kg5,258lb | 2,275kg5,016lb |
| Gross weight | 2,975kg6,559lb | 3,150kg6,945lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 83.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 105.3s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.5s Calculated | 53.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated | 109hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 231Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated | 264Nm/t176lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 1,089km676mi Calculated |
| Displacement | - | 2,997cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,863mm191in | 5,000mm197in |
| Width | 1,940mm76in | - |
| Height | 1,685mm66in | 1,869mm74in |
| Wheelbase | 3,030mm119in | 2,922mm115in |
| Front track | 1,654mm65in | 1,693mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,659mm65in | 1,685mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 181mm7in | 297mm12in |
| Trunk volume | 520L | 900L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,675L | 2,190L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | - | 86L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWh | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.5 s | 53.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWh | 245 hp 183 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250 | 249 hp 186 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D250 has 4 hp more than Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 98 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 98 kWh and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D250: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWh | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWh | 2,385 kg 5,258 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250 | 2,275 kg 5,016 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250 | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWh | 7.6 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250 | 8.6 s |
Although Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D250 has more power, Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 98 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 98 kWh and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D250: 1.0 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWh | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250 | 109 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWh | 245 hp 183 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250 | 249 hp 186 kW | 8.6 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWh | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp 183 kW | 249 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,385 kg 5,258 lb | 2,275 kg 5,016 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 1,089 km 676 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | 900 L 31.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 109 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D250 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 98 kWh
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D250
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 110 kg lighter
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 380 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























