Car comparison

Land Rover Discovery Sport · Facelift 2019 2.0 P250vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Land Rover Discovery Sport · Facelift 2019

2.0 P250

250 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2019-present
VS

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 T5

250 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P250

  • Fastest top speed
    225 km/h
    140 mph
  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW
  • Highest torque
    365 Nm
    269 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,864 kg
    4,109 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    134 hp/t
    100 kW/t
    7.5 kg/hp
  • Best estimated range
    838 km
    520 mi
  • Largest trunk
    1,179 L
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best practicality score
    92/100

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.9 s
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.3 L/100 km
    32.2 mpg US
    38.7 mpg UK
  • Best performance score
    53/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLand RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Power
250hp186kW
250hp186kW
Torque
365Nm269lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,864kg4,109lb
1,927kg4,248lb
Gross weight
2,550kg5,622lb
-
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
93.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
76.1s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
6.9s
0-200 km/h
38.2s
Calculated
35.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
6.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
15.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton
Calculated
182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
838km520mi
Calculated
822km511mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,597mm181in
4,688mm185in
Width-
1,902mm75in
Height
1,727mm68in
1,658mm65in
Wheelbase
2,741mm108in
2,865mm113in
Front track
1,636mm64in
1,668mm66in
Rear track
1,643mm65in
1,673mm66in
Ground clearance
212mm8in
216mm9in
Trunk volume
1,179L
505L
Max trunk volume
1,794L
1,432L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
67L
60L
CO2 emissions-
169g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P250Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5PowerTorque
  • Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P250: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P2505,500 rpm1,400-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T55,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm6,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLand RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
6.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
6.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
38.2 s
35.2 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
15.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
146 km/h
91 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250
250 hp
186 kW
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250
1,864 kg
4,109 lb
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
1,927 kg
4,248 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250
225 km/h
140 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 and Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P250: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 and Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P250: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250
838 km
520 mi
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
822 km
511 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250
250 hp
186 kW
7.8 s
225 km/h
140 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW
6.9 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,179 L
41.6 cu ft
Length
4,597 mm
181.0 in
Height
1,727 mm
68.0 in
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
7.8 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
6.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLand RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
6.9 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,864 kg
4,109 lb
1,927 kg
4,248 lb
Fuel consumption
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,179 L
41.6 cu ft
Length
4,597 mm
181.0 in
Height
1,727 mm
68.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Range score
838 km
520 mi
822 km
511 mi
CO2 score
-
169 g/km
Trunk score
1,179 L
41.6 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLand Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P250Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5
Consumption8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.00 LC100 km12.78 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.53 LC100 mi20.56 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,100 LC/year1,916 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P250

  • Has 15 Nm more
  • Is 63 kg lighter
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 16 km (10 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 674 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5

  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 P250
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Land Rover Discovery Sport · Facelift 2019 2.0 P250 vs Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster