Land Rover Discovery Sport · Facelift 2019
Car comparison
Land Rover Discovery Sport · Facelift 2019 2.0 P250vsChevrolet Equinox III 550T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonChevrolet Equinox III
550T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P250
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Highest torque365 Nm269 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range838 km520 mi
- Largest trunk1,179 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Chevrolet Equinox III 550T
- Most powerful260 hp194 kW
- Lightest1,710 kg3,770 lb
- Best power-to-weight152 hp/t113 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
- Best performance score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250 | ChevroletEquinox III550T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 260hp194kW |
| Torque | 365Nm269lb-ft | 353Nm260lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,864kg4,109lb | 1,710kg3,770lb |
| Gross weight | 2,550kg5,622lb | - |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 98.4s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 80.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 39.6s Calculated | 38.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 152hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated | 206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 838km520mi Calculated | 711km442mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,597mm181in | 4,652mm183in |
| Width | 2,069mm81in | 1,843mm73in |
| Height | 1,727mm68in | 1,693mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,741mm108in | 2,725mm107in |
| Front track | 1,636mm64in | 1,573mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,643mm65in | 1,585mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 212mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 1,179L | 431L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,794L | 1,505L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 67L | 59L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P250: Power / Torque
- Chevrolet Equinox III 550T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250 | 5,500 rpm | 1,400-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-5,300 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250 | ChevroletEquinox III550T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 39.6 s | 38.0 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250 | 250 hp 186 kW |
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 260 hp 194 kW |
Chevrolet Equinox III 550T has 10 hp more than Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P250.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P250 and Chevrolet Equinox III 550T: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 353 Nm 260 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250 | 1,864 kg 4,109 lb |
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250 | 7.8 s |
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 7.8 s |
Although Chevrolet Equinox III 550T has more power, Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P250 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250 | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250 | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250 | 838 km 520 mi |
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 711 km 442 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250 | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.8 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 260 hp 194 kW | 7.8 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ChevroletEquinox III550T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250 |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| ChevroletEquinox III550T |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Chevrolet Equinox III 550T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250 | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250 | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250 | ChevroletEquinox III550T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 260 hp 194 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | 353 Nm 260 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,864 kg 4,109 lb | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 838 km 520 mi | 711 km 442 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 1,179 L 41.6 cu ft | 431 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P250 | Chevrolet Equinox III 550T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.00 LC100 km | 14.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,100 LC/year | 2,179 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P250
- Has 12 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 127 km (79 mi) more estimated range
- Has 748 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Chevrolet Equinox III 550T
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 154 kg lighter
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























