Lancia Delta III (844) · Facelift 2011
Car comparison
Lancia Delta III (844) · Facelift 2011 1.9 MultiJet 16VvsVolvo V40 2.0 D4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V40
2.0 D4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V40 2.0 D4
- Lightest1,398 kg3,082 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,154 km717 mi
- Largest trunk496 L
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Lancia Delta III (844) Facelift 2011 1.9 MultiJet 16V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Fastest top speed222 km/h138 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight133 hp/t99 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score50/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LanciaDelta III (844)Facelift 20111.9 MultiJet 16V | VolvoV402.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 177hp132kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,430kg3,153lb | 1,398kg3,082lb |
| Gross weight | 2,000kg4,409lb | 2,040kg4,497lb |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 86.3s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 84.3s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.5s Calculated | 44.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 127hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 280Nm/t187lb-ft/ton Calculated | 286Nm/t191lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,018km632mi Calculated | 1,154km717mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,910cc117cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,520mm178in | 4,369mm172in |
| Width | 1,797mm71in | 1,802mm71in |
| Height | 1,499mm59in | 1,445mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,647mm104in |
| Front track | 1,538mm61in | 1,546mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,531mm60in | 1,536mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 420L | 496L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,190L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 136g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lancia Delta III (844) Facelift 2011 1.9 MultiJet 16V: Power / Torque
- Volvo V40 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LanciaDelta III (844)Facelift 20111.9 MultiJet 16V | 4,000 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 3,500 rpm | 1,750-2,750 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LanciaDelta III (844)Facelift 20111.9 MultiJet 16V | VolvoV402.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.5 s | 44.6 s |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 91 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LanciaDelta III (844)Facelift 20111.9 MultiJet 16V | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 177 hp 132 kW |
Lancia Delta III (844) Facelift 2011 1.9 MultiJet 16V has 13 hp more than Volvo V40 2.0 D4.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V40 2.0 D4 and Lancia Delta III (844) Facelift 2011 1.9 MultiJet 16V: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LanciaDelta III (844)Facelift 20111.9 MultiJet 16V | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LanciaDelta III (844)Facelift 20111.9 MultiJet 16V | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 1,398 kg 3,082 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LanciaDelta III (844)Facelift 20111.9 MultiJet 16V | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LanciaDelta III (844)Facelift 20111.9 MultiJet 16V | 7.9 s |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 8.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lancia Delta III (844) Facelift 2011 1.9 MultiJet 16V and Volvo V40 2.0 D4: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LanciaDelta III (844)Facelift 20111.9 MultiJet 16V | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V40 2.0 D4 and Lancia Delta III (844) Facelift 2011 1.9 MultiJet 16V: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LanciaDelta III (844)Facelift 20111.9 MultiJet 16V | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LanciaDelta III (844)Facelift 20111.9 MultiJet 16V | 1,018 km 632 mi |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 1,154 km 717 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LanciaDelta III (844)Facelift 20111.9 MultiJet 16V | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 177 hp 132 kW | 8.3 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LanciaDelta III (844)Facelift 20111.9 MultiJet 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV402.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LanciaDelta III (844)Facelift 20111.9 MultiJet 16V |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV402.0 D4 |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Lancia Delta III (844) Facelift 2011 1.9 MultiJet 16V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LanciaDelta III (844)Facelift 20111.9 MultiJet 16V | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LanciaDelta III (844)Facelift 20111.9 MultiJet 16V | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LanciaDelta III (844)Facelift 20111.9 MultiJet 16V | VolvoV402.0 D4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 177 hp 132 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | 1,398 kg 3,082 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,018 km 632 mi | 1,154 km 717 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 136 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | 496 L 17.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lancia Delta III (844) Facelift 2011 1.9 MultiJet 16V | Volvo V40 2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.98 LC100 km | 9.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,496 LC/year | 1,365 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lancia Delta III (844) Facelift 2011 1.9 MultiJet 16V
- Has 13 hp more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volvo V40 2.0 D4
- Is 32 kg lighter
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 136 km (85 mi) more estimated range
- Has 76 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























