Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren (C199)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren (C199) 5.5 V8 KompressorvsLamborghini Murcielago 6.2 V12 48V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLamborghini Murcielago
6.2 V12 48V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren (C199) 5.5 V8 Kompressor
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.8 s
- Fastest top speed334 km/h208 mph
- Most powerful626 hp467 kW
- Highest torque780 Nm575 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight370 hp/t276 kW/t2.7 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption20.9 L/100 km11.3 mpg US13.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
- Largest trunk272 L
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score92/100
- Best economy score68/100
- Best practicality score37/100
Lamborghini Murcielago 6.2 V12 48V
- Lightest1,650 kg3,638 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)5.5 V8 Kompressor | LamborghiniMurcielago6.2 V12 48V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 626hp467kW | 580hp433kW |
| Torque | 780Nm575lb-ft | 650Nm479lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,693kg3,732lb | 1,650kg3,638lb |
| Gross weight | 1,940kg4,277lb | 2,000kg4,409lb |
| Top speed | 334 km/h 208 mph | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 61.6s99% target: 331 km/h / 205 mph Calculated | 56.5s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 3.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.6s | 10.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 3.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.5L/100 km16.2mpg US19.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 20.9L/100 km11.3mpg US13.5mpg UK | 32.6L/100 km7.2mpg US8.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | 15.1L/100 km15.6mpg US18.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.5s Calculated | 11.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 370hp/t276kW/t168hp/1000 lb Calculated | 352hp/t262kW/t159hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 461Nm/t308lb-ft/ton Calculated | 394Nm/t264lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 669km416mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 5,439cc332cu in | 6,192cc378cu in |
| Length | 4,656mm183in | 4,580mm180in |
| Width | 1,908mm75in | 2,045mm81in |
| Height | 1,261mm50in | 1,140mm45in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,665mm105in |
| Front track | 1,638mm64in | 1,635mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,569mm62in | 1,695mm67in |
| Trunk volume | 272L | 140L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 97L | 100L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren (C199) 5.5 V8 Kompressor: Power / Torque
- Lamborghini Murcielago 6.2 V12 48V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)5.5 V8 Kompressor | 6,500 rpm | 3,250-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| LamborghiniMurcielago6.2 V12 48V | 7,500 rpm | 5,400 rpm | 7,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)5.5 V8 Kompressor | LamborghiniMurcielago6.2 V12 48V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 3.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 3.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.6 s | 10.5 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 43.1 s | 44.9 s |
| Top speed | 334 km/h 208 mph | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.6 s | 7.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.7 s | 9.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.5 s | 11.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 209 km/h 130 mph | 211 km/h 131 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)5.5 V8 Kompressor | 626 hp 467 kW |
| LamborghiniMurcielago6.2 V12 48V | 580 hp 433 kW |
Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren (C199) 5.5 V8 Kompressor has 46 hp more than Lamborghini Murcielago 6.2 V12 48V.
The biggest power difference is between Lamborghini Murcielago 6.2 V12 48V and Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren (C199) 5.5 V8 Kompressor: 46 hp (34 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)5.5 V8 Kompressor | 780 Nm 575 lb-ft |
| LamborghiniMurcielago6.2 V12 48V | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)5.5 V8 Kompressor | 1,693 kg 3,732 lb |
| LamborghiniMurcielago6.2 V12 48V | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)5.5 V8 Kompressor | 334 km/h 208 mph |
| LamborghiniMurcielago6.2 V12 48V | 330 km/h 205 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)5.5 V8 Kompressor | 3.8 s |
| LamborghiniMurcielago6.2 V12 48V | 3.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren (C199) 5.5 V8 Kompressor and Lamborghini Murcielago 6.2 V12 48V: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)5.5 V8 Kompressor | 370 hp/t 276 kW/t 2.7 kg/hp |
| LamborghiniMurcielago6.2 V12 48V | 352 hp/t 262 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)5.5 V8 Kompressor | 626 hp 467 kW | 3.8 s | 334 km/h 208 mph |
| LamborghiniMurcielago6.2 V12 48V | 580 hp 433 kW | 3.9 s | 330 km/h 205 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)5.5 V8 Kompressor |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LamborghiniMurcielago6.2 V12 48V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)5.5 V8 Kompressor | LamborghiniMurcielago6.2 V12 48V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 626 hp 467 kW | 580 hp 433 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 780 Nm 575 lb-ft | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 3.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 334 km/h 208 mph | 330 km/h 205 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,693 kg 3,732 lb | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 669 km 416 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 272 L 9.6 cu ft | 140 L 4.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 370 hp/t 276 kW/t 2.7 kg/hp | 352 hp/t 262 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren (C199) 5.5 V8 Kompressor |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.5 L/100 km16.2 mpg US19.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 40.84 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,175 L575 US gal478 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,806 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren (C199) 5.5 V8 Kompressor
- Has 46 hp more
- Has 130 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 132 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Lamborghini Murcielago 6.2 V12 48V
- Is 43 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























