Lamborghini Diablo
Car comparison
Lamborghini Diablo VTvsLamborghini Gallardo Coupe 5.0 V10
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLamborghini Gallardo Coupe
5.0 V10
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lamborghini Diablo VT
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.1 s
- Fastest top speed325 km/h202 mph
- Highest torque580 Nm428 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption15.2 L/100 km15.5 mpg US18.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption20.0 L/100 km11.8 mpg US14.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption13.3 L/100 km17.7 mpg US21.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range658 km409 mi
- Largest trunk140 L
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score88/100
- Best economy score66/100
- Best practicality score31/100
Lamborghini Gallardo Coupe 5.0 V10
- Most powerful500 hp373 kW
- Lightest1,430 kg3,153 lb
- Best power-to-weight350 hp/t261 kW/t2.9 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | LamborghiniDiabloVT | LamborghiniGallardo Coupe5.0 V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 492hp367kW | 500hp373kW |
| Torque | 580Nm428lb-ft | 510Nm376lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,625kg3,583lb | 1,430kg3,153lb |
| Gross weight | 1,840kg4,057lb | - |
| Top speed | 325 km/h 202 mph | 309 km/h 192 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 62.7s99% target: 322 km/h / 200 mph Calculated | 58.0s99% target: 306 km/h / 190 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.1s | 4.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.5s Calculated | 11.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.9s Calculated | 4.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 15.2L/100 km15.5mpg US18.6mpg UK | 19.5L/100 km12.1mpg US14.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 20L/100 km11.8mpg US14.1mpg UK | 29.1L/100 km8.1mpg US9.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 13.3L/100 km17.7mpg US21.2mpg UK | 13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.9s Calculated | 12.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 303hp/t226kW/t137hp/1000 lb Calculated | 350hp/t261kW/t159hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 357Nm/t239lb-ft/ton Calculated | 357Nm/t239lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 658km409mi Calculated | 462km287mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,707cc348cu in | 4,961cc303cu in |
| Length | 4,460mm176in | 4,300mm169in |
| Width | 2,040mm80in | 1,900mm75in |
| Height | 1,105mm44in | 1,165mm46in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | 2,560mm101in |
| Front track | 1,540mm61in | 1,622mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,640mm65in | 1,592mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 140L | 110L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 100L | 90L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 450g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lamborghini Diablo VT: Power / Torque
- Lamborghini Gallardo Coupe 5.0 V10: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiabloVT | 6,800 rpm | 5,200 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
| LamborghiniGallardo Coupe5.0 V10 | 7,800 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 8,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LamborghiniDiabloVT | LamborghiniGallardo Coupe5.0 V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.9 s | 4.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.1 s | 4.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.5 s | 11.9 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 63.3 s | - |
| Top speed | 325 km/h 202 mph | 309 km/h 192 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.9 s | 8.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.1 s | 10.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.9 s | 12.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 203 km/h 126 mph | 201 km/h 125 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiabloVT | 492 hp 367 kW |
| LamborghiniGallardo Coupe5.0 V10 | 500 hp 373 kW |
Lamborghini Gallardo Coupe 5.0 V10 has 8 hp more than Lamborghini Diablo VT.
The biggest power difference is between Lamborghini Diablo VT and Lamborghini Gallardo Coupe 5.0 V10: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiabloVT | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft |
| LamborghiniGallardo Coupe5.0 V10 | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiabloVT | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb |
| LamborghiniGallardo Coupe5.0 V10 | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiabloVT | 325 km/h 202 mph |
| LamborghiniGallardo Coupe5.0 V10 | 309 km/h 192 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiabloVT | 4.1 s |
| LamborghiniGallardo Coupe5.0 V10 | 4.2 s |
Although Lamborghini Gallardo Coupe 5.0 V10 has more power, Lamborghini Diablo VT is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lamborghini Diablo VT and Lamborghini Gallardo Coupe 5.0 V10: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiabloVT | 15.2 L/100 km 15.5 mpg US 18.6 mpg UK |
| LamborghiniGallardo Coupe5.0 V10 | 19.5 L/100 km 12.1 mpg US 14.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lamborghini Diablo VT and Lamborghini Gallardo Coupe 5.0 V10: 4.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiabloVT | 303 hp/t 226 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
| LamborghiniGallardo Coupe5.0 V10 | 350 hp/t 261 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiabloVT | 658 km 409 mi |
| LamborghiniGallardo Coupe5.0 V10 | 462 km 287 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiabloVT | 492 hp 367 kW | 4.1 s | 325 km/h 202 mph |
| LamborghiniGallardo Coupe5.0 V10 | 500 hp 373 kW | 4.2 s | 309 km/h 192 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiabloVT |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LamborghiniGallardo Coupe5.0 V10 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiabloVT |
| 15.2 L/100 km 15.5 mpg US 18.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| LamborghiniGallardo Coupe5.0 V10 |
| 19.5 L/100 km 12.1 mpg US 14.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Lamborghini Diablo VT is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiabloVT | 15.2 L/100 km 15.5 mpg US 18.6 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
| LamborghiniGallardo Coupe5.0 V10 | 19.5 L/100 km 12.1 mpg US 14.5 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiabloVT | 303 hp/t 226 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 15.2 L/100 km 15.5 mpg US 18.6 mpg UK |
| LamborghiniGallardo Coupe5.0 V10 | 350 hp/t 261 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 19.5 L/100 km 12.1 mpg US 14.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LamborghiniDiabloVT | LamborghiniGallardo Coupe5.0 V10 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 492 hp 367 kW | 500 hp 373 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.1 s | 4.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 325 km/h 202 mph | 309 km/h 192 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 15.2 L/100 km 15.5 mpg US 18.6 mpg UK | 19.5 L/100 km 12.1 mpg US 14.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 658 km 409 mi | 462 km 287 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 450 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 140 L 4.9 cu ft | 110 L 3.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 303 hp/t 226 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 350 hp/t 261 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lamborghini Diablo VT | Lamborghini Gallardo Coupe 5.0 V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 15.2 L/100 km15.5 mpg US18.6 mpg UK | 19.5 L/100 km12.1 mpg US14.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 26.60 LC100 km | 34.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 42.81 LC100 mi | 54.92 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,280 L602 US gal502 UK gal | 2,925 L773 US gal643 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,990 LC/year | 5,119 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lamborghini Diablo VT
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 4.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 196 km (122 mi) more estimated range
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Lamborghini Gallardo Coupe 5.0 V10
- Has 8 hp more
- Is 195 kg lighter
- Has 47 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























