Ferrari 550 Maranello
Car comparison
Ferrari 550 Maranello 5.5 V12vsLamborghini Diablo VT
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLamborghini Diablo
VT
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lamborghini Diablo VT
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.1 s
- Most powerful492 hp367 kW
- Highest torque580 Nm428 lb-ft
- Lightest1,625 kg3,583 lb
- Best power-to-weight303 hp/t226 kW/t3.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption15.2 L/100 km15.5 mpg US18.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption20.0 L/100 km11.8 mpg US14.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption13.3 L/100 km17.7 mpg US21.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range658 km409 mi
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score88/100
- Best economy score66/100
Ferrari 550 Maranello 5.5 V12
- Fastest top speed330 km/h205 mph Unrestricted320 km/h199 mph Restricted
- Largest trunk185 L
- Best practicality score34/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | LamborghiniDiabloVT |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 485hp362kW | 492hp367kW |
| Torque | 569Nm420lb-ft | 580Nm428lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,690kg3,726lb | 1,625kg3,583lb |
| Gross weight | 1,950kg4,299lb | 1,840kg4,057lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph Calculated | 325 km/h 202 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.7s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated | 62.7s99% target: 322 km/h / 200 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.4s | 4.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.5s Calculated | 11.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.2s Calculated | 3.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 24.4L/100 km9.6mpg US11.6mpg UK | 15.2L/100 km15.5mpg US18.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 38.2L/100 km6.2mpg US7.4mpg UK | 20L/100 km11.8mpg US14.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 16.4L/100 km14.3mpg US17.2mpg UK | 13.3L/100 km17.7mpg US21.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.2s Calculated | 11.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 287hp/t214kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated | 303hp/t226kW/t137hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 337Nm/t225lb-ft/ton Calculated | 357Nm/t239lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 467km290mi Calculated | 658km409mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,474cc334cu in | 5,707cc348cu in |
| Length | 4,550mm179in | 4,460mm176in |
| Width | 1,935mm76in | 2,040mm80in |
| Height | 1,277mm50in | 1,105mm44in |
| Wheelbase | 2,500mm98in | 2,650mm104in |
| Front track | 1,632mm64in | 1,540mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,586mm62in | 1,640mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 135mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 185L | 140L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 114L | 100L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ferrari 550 Maranello 5.5 V12: Power / Torque
- Lamborghini Diablo VT: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | 7,000 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
| LamborghiniDiabloVT | 6,800 rpm | 5,200 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | LamborghiniDiabloVT |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.2 s | 3.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.4 s | 4.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.5 s | 11.5 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 57.2 s | 63.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph Likely limited | 325 km/h 202 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.1 s | 7.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 10.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.2 s | 11.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 197 km/h 123 mph | 203 km/h 126 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | 485 hp 362 kW |
| LamborghiniDiabloVT | 492 hp 367 kW |
Lamborghini Diablo VT has 7 hp more than Ferrari 550 Maranello 5.5 V12.
The biggest power difference is between Ferrari 550 Maranello 5.5 V12 and Lamborghini Diablo VT: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | 569 Nm 420 lb-ft |
| LamborghiniDiabloVT | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb |
| LamborghiniDiabloVT | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph |
| LamborghiniDiabloVT | 325 km/h 202 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | 4.4 s |
| LamborghiniDiabloVT | 4.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lamborghini Diablo VT and Ferrari 550 Maranello 5.5 V12: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | 24.4 L/100 km 9.6 mpg US 11.6 mpg UK |
| LamborghiniDiabloVT | 15.2 L/100 km 15.5 mpg US 18.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lamborghini Diablo VT and Ferrari 550 Maranello 5.5 V12: 9.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | 287 hp/t 214 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| LamborghiniDiabloVT | 303 hp/t 226 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | 467 km 290 mi |
| LamborghiniDiabloVT | 658 km 409 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | 485 hp 362 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph |
| LamborghiniDiabloVT | 492 hp 367 kW | 4.1 s | 325 km/h 202 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LamborghiniDiabloVT |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 |
| 24.4 L/100 km 9.6 mpg US 11.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| LamborghiniDiabloVT |
| 15.2 L/100 km 15.5 mpg US 18.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Lamborghini Diablo VT is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | 24.4 L/100 km 9.6 mpg US 11.6 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
| LamborghiniDiabloVT | 15.2 L/100 km 15.5 mpg US 18.6 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | 287 hp/t 214 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 24.4 L/100 km 9.6 mpg US 11.6 mpg UK |
| LamborghiniDiabloVT | 303 hp/t 226 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 15.2 L/100 km 15.5 mpg US 18.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | LamborghiniDiabloVT | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 485 hp 362 kW | 492 hp 367 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 569 Nm 420 lb-ft | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.4 s | 4.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph | 325 km/h 202 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 24.4 L/100 km 9.6 mpg US 11.6 mpg UK | 15.2 L/100 km 15.5 mpg US 18.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 467 km 290 mi | 658 km 409 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 185 L 6.5 cu ft | 140 L 4.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 287 hp/t 214 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 303 hp/t 226 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ferrari 550 Maranello 5.5 V12 | Lamborghini Diablo VT |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 24.4 L/100 km9.6 mpg US11.6 mpg UK | 15.2 L/100 km15.5 mpg US18.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 42.70 LC100 km | 26.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 68.72 LC100 mi | 42.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 3,660 L967 US gal805 UK gal | 2,280 L602 US gal502 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 6,405 LC/year | 3,990 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ferrari 550 Maranello 5.5 V12
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 45 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Lamborghini Diablo VT
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 11 Nm more
- Is 65 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 9.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 191 km (118 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























