Lamborghini Diablo
Car comparison
Lamborghini Diablo 6.0 V12vsLamborghini Gallardo Coupe 5.0 V10
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLamborghini Gallardo Coupe
5.0 V10
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lamborghini Diablo 6.0 V12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.9 s
- Fastest top speed330 km/h205 mph
- Most powerful550 hp410 kW
- Highest torque620 Nm457 lb-ft
- Largest trunk140 L
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score90/100
- Best practicality score31/100
Lamborghini Gallardo Coupe 5.0 V10
- Lightest1,430 kg3,153 lb
- Best power-to-weight364 hp/t271 kW/t2.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption17.0 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption24.8 L/100 km9.5 mpg US11.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption12.4 L/100 km19.0 mpg US22.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range529 km329 mi
- Best economy score61/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 | LamborghiniGallardo Coupe5.0 V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550hp410kW | 520hp388kW |
| Torque | 620Nm457lb-ft | 510Nm376lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,625kg3,583lb | 1,430kg3,153lb |
| Gross weight | 1,850kg4,079lb | - |
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 57.3s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated | 54.1s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.9s | 3.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.6s Calculated | 10.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.7s Calculated | 3.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 22.9L/100 km10.3mpg US12.3mpg UK | 17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 37.9L/100 km6.2mpg US7.5mpg UK | 24.8L/100 km9.5mpg US11.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 17.3L/100 km13.6mpg US16.3mpg UK | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.6s Calculated | 11.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 338hp/t252kW/t154hp/1000 lb Calculated | 364hp/t271kW/t165hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 382Nm/t255lb-ft/ton Calculated | 357Nm/t239lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 437km271mi Calculated | 529km329mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,992cc366cu in | 4,961cc303cu in |
| Length | 4,470mm176in | 4,300mm169in |
| Width | 2,040mm80in | 1,900mm75in |
| Height | 1,105mm44in | 1,165mm46in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | 2,560mm101in |
| Front track | 1,610mm63in | 1,622mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,670mm66in | 1,592mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 140L | 110L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 100L | 90L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 400g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lamborghini Diablo 6.0 V12: Power / Torque
- Lamborghini Gallardo Coupe 5.0 V10: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 | 7,100 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 7,350 rpm |
| LamborghiniGallardo Coupe5.0 V10 | 8,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm | 8,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 | LamborghiniGallardo Coupe5.0 V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.7 s | 3.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.9 s | 3.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.6 s | 10.9 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 45.5 s | - |
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 7.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.8 s | 9.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.6 s | 11.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 210 km/h 130 mph | 207 km/h 129 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 | 550 hp 410 kW |
| LamborghiniGallardo Coupe5.0 V10 | 520 hp 388 kW |
Lamborghini Diablo 6.0 V12 has 30 hp more than Lamborghini Gallardo Coupe 5.0 V10.
The biggest power difference is between Lamborghini Gallardo Coupe 5.0 V10 and Lamborghini Diablo 6.0 V12: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
| LamborghiniGallardo Coupe5.0 V10 | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb |
| LamborghiniGallardo Coupe5.0 V10 | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| LamborghiniGallardo Coupe5.0 V10 | 315 km/h 196 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 | 3.9 s |
| LamborghiniGallardo Coupe5.0 V10 | 3.9 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 | 22.9 L/100 km 10.3 mpg US 12.3 mpg UK |
| LamborghiniGallardo Coupe5.0 V10 | 17.0 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lamborghini Gallardo Coupe 5.0 V10 and Lamborghini Diablo 6.0 V12: 5.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 | 338 hp/t 252 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
| LamborghiniGallardo Coupe5.0 V10 | 364 hp/t 271 kW/t 2.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 | 437 km 271 mi |
| LamborghiniGallardo Coupe5.0 V10 | 529 km 329 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 | 550 hp 410 kW | 3.9 s | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| LamborghiniGallardo Coupe5.0 V10 | 520 hp 388 kW | 3.9 s | 315 km/h 196 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LamborghiniGallardo Coupe5.0 V10 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 |
| 22.9 L/100 km 10.3 mpg US 12.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| LamborghiniGallardo Coupe5.0 V10 |
| 17.0 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Lamborghini Gallardo Coupe 5.0 V10 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 | 22.9 L/100 km 10.3 mpg US 12.3 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
| LamborghiniGallardo Coupe5.0 V10 | 17.0 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.6 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 | 338 hp/t 252 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 22.9 L/100 km 10.3 mpg US 12.3 mpg UK |
| LamborghiniGallardo Coupe5.0 V10 | 364 hp/t 271 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp | 17.0 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 | LamborghiniGallardo Coupe5.0 V10 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp 410 kW | 520 hp 388 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.9 s | 3.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 22.9 L/100 km 10.3 mpg US 12.3 mpg UK | 17.0 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 437 km 271 mi | 529 km 329 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 400 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 140 L 4.9 cu ft | 110 L 3.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 338 hp/t 252 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 364 hp/t 271 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lamborghini Diablo 6.0 V12 | Lamborghini Gallardo Coupe 5.0 V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 22.9 L/100 km10.3 mpg US12.3 mpg UK | 17 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 40.07 LC100 km | 29.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 64.49 LC100 mi | 47.88 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 3,435 L907 US gal756 UK gal | 2,550 L674 US gal561 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 6,011 LC/year | 4,463 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lamborghini Diablo 6.0 V12
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 110 Nm more
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Lamborghini Gallardo Coupe 5.0 V10
- Is 195 kg lighter
- Uses 5.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 93 km (58 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























