RUF CTR 3
Car comparison
RUF CTR 3 Clubsport 3.8vsLamborghini Aventador LP 700-4 Coupe 6.5 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLamborghini Aventador LP 700-4 Coupe
6.5 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
RUF CTR 3 Clubsport 3.8
- Fastest top speed380 km/h236 mph
- Most powerful777 hp579 kW
- Highest torque980 Nm723 lb-ft
- Lightest1,400 kg3,086 lb
- Best power-to-weight555 hp/t414 kW/t1.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption13.7 L/100 km17.2 mpg US20.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption20.0 L/100 km11.8 mpg US14.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions325 g/km
- Best overall score76/100
- Best performance score95/100
- Best economy score70/100
Lamborghini Aventador LP 700-4 Coupe 6.5 V12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.9 s
- Best practicality score39/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RUFCTR 3Clubsport 3.8 | LamborghiniAventador LP 700-4 Coupe6.5 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 777hp579kW | 700hp522kW |
| Torque | 980Nm723lb-ft | 690Nm509lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,400kg3,086lb | 1,575kg3,472lb |
| Top speed | 380 km/h 236 mph | 350 km/h 217 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.7s99% target: 376 km/h / 234 mph Calculated | 40.1s99% target: 347 km/h / 215 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.2s | 2.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.2s | 7.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.1s Calculated | 2.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.7L/100 km17.2mpg US20.6mpg UK | 17.2L/100 km13.7mpg US16.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 20L/100 km11.8mpg US14.1mpg UK | 27.3L/100 km8.6mpg US10.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.8s Calculated | 10.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 555hp/t414kW/t252hp/1000 lb Calculated | 444hp/t331kW/t202hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 700Nm/t468lb-ft/ton Calculated | 438Nm/t293lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 523km325mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,746cc229cu in | 6,498cc397cu in |
| Length | - | 4,780mm188in |
| Width | - | 2,030mm80in |
| Height | - | 1,136mm45in |
| Wheelbase | 2,625mm103in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | - | 1,720mm68in |
| Rear track | - | 1,700mm67in |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | - | 90L |
| CO2 emissions | 325g/km | 398g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- RUF CTR 3 Clubsport 3.8: Power / Torque
- Lamborghini Aventador LP 700-4 Coupe 6.5 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RUFCTR 3Clubsport 3.8 | 7,100 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 7,350 rpm |
| LamborghiniAventador LP 700-4 Coupe6.5 V12 | 8,250 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 8,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RUFCTR 3Clubsport 3.8 | LamborghiniAventador LP 700-4 Coupe6.5 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.1 s | 2.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.2 s | 2.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.2 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 27.3 s | 21.9 s |
| Top speed | 380 km/h 236 mph | 350 km/h 217 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.8 s | 4.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.1 s | 6.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.1 s | 8.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.8 s | 10.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 219 km/h 136 mph | 241 km/h 150 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RUFCTR 3Clubsport 3.8 | 777 hp 579 kW |
| LamborghiniAventador LP 700-4 Coupe6.5 V12 | 700 hp 522 kW |
RUF CTR 3 Clubsport 3.8 has 77 hp more than Lamborghini Aventador LP 700-4 Coupe 6.5 V12.
The biggest power difference is between Lamborghini Aventador LP 700-4 Coupe 6.5 V12 and RUF CTR 3 Clubsport 3.8: 77 hp (57 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RUFCTR 3Clubsport 3.8 | 980 Nm 723 lb-ft |
| LamborghiniAventador LP 700-4 Coupe6.5 V12 | 690 Nm 509 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RUFCTR 3Clubsport 3.8 | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb |
| LamborghiniAventador LP 700-4 Coupe6.5 V12 | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RUFCTR 3Clubsport 3.8 | 380 km/h 236 mph |
| LamborghiniAventador LP 700-4 Coupe6.5 V12 | 350 km/h 217 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RUFCTR 3Clubsport 3.8 | 3.2 s |
| LamborghiniAventador LP 700-4 Coupe6.5 V12 | 2.9 s |
Although RUF CTR 3 Clubsport 3.8 has more power, Lamborghini Aventador LP 700-4 Coupe 6.5 V12 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lamborghini Aventador LP 700-4 Coupe 6.5 V12 and RUF CTR 3 Clubsport 3.8: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RUFCTR 3Clubsport 3.8 | 13.7 L/100 km 17.2 mpg US 20.6 mpg UK |
| LamborghiniAventador LP 700-4 Coupe6.5 V12 | 17.2 L/100 km 13.7 mpg US 16.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between RUF CTR 3 Clubsport 3.8 and Lamborghini Aventador LP 700-4 Coupe 6.5 V12: 3.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RUFCTR 3Clubsport 3.8 | 555 hp/t 414 kW/t 1.8 kg/hp |
| LamborghiniAventador LP 700-4 Coupe6.5 V12 | 444 hp/t 331 kW/t 2.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RUFCTR 3Clubsport 3.8 | 777 hp 579 kW | 3.2 s | 380 km/h 236 mph |
| LamborghiniAventador LP 700-4 Coupe6.5 V12 | 700 hp 522 kW | 2.9 s | 350 km/h 217 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUFCTR 3Clubsport 3.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LamborghiniAventador LP 700-4 Coupe6.5 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUFCTR 3Clubsport 3.8 |
| 13.7 L/100 km 17.2 mpg US 20.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| LamborghiniAventador LP 700-4 Coupe6.5 V12 |
| 17.2 L/100 km 13.7 mpg US 16.4 mpg UK | ||||||
RUF CTR 3 Clubsport 3.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RUFCTR 3Clubsport 3.8 | 13.7 L/100 km 17.2 mpg US 20.6 mpg UK | 3.2 s |
| LamborghiniAventador LP 700-4 Coupe6.5 V12 | 17.2 L/100 km 13.7 mpg US 16.4 mpg UK | 2.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RUFCTR 3Clubsport 3.8 | 555 hp/t 414 kW/t 1.8 kg/hp | 13.7 L/100 km 17.2 mpg US 20.6 mpg UK |
| LamborghiniAventador LP 700-4 Coupe6.5 V12 | 444 hp/t 331 kW/t 2.3 kg/hp | 17.2 L/100 km 13.7 mpg US 16.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RUFCTR 3Clubsport 3.8 | LamborghiniAventador LP 700-4 Coupe6.5 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 777 hp 579 kW | 700 hp 522 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 980 Nm 723 lb-ft | 690 Nm 509 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.2 s | 2.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 380 km/h 236 mph | 350 km/h 217 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.7 L/100 km 17.2 mpg US 20.6 mpg UK | 17.2 L/100 km 13.7 mpg US 16.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 523 km 325 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 325 g/km | 398 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 555 hp/t 414 kW/t 1.8 kg/hp | 444 hp/t 331 kW/t 2.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | RUF CTR 3 Clubsport 3.8 | Lamborghini Aventador LP 700-4 Coupe 6.5 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.7 L/100 km17.2 mpg US20.6 mpg UK | 17.2 L/100 km13.7 mpg US16.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 23.97 LC100 km | 30.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 38.58 LC100 mi | 48.44 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,055 L543 US gal452 UK gal | 2,580 L682 US gal568 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,596 LC/year | 4,515 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
RUF CTR 3 Clubsport 3.8
- Has 77 hp more
- Has 290 Nm more
- Is 175 kg lighter
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 111 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 73 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Lamborghini Aventador LP 700-4 Coupe 6.5 V12
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























