Porsche Cayenne II
Car comparison
Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8vsJeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2013 SRT8 6.4 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2013
SRT8 6.4 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Fastest top speed278 km/h173 mph
- Most powerful500 hp373 kW
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Lightest2,170 kg4,784 lb
- Best power-to-weight230 hp/t172 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption16.2 L/100 km14.5 mpg US17.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions270 g/km
- Best estimated range739 km459 mi
- Largest trunk670 L
- Best overall score85/100
- Best performance score82/100
- Best economy score76/100
- Best practicality score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT8 6.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 500hp373kW | 468hp349kW |
| Torque | 700Nm516lb-ft | 624Nm460lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,170kg4,784lb | 2,342kg5,163lb |
| Gross weight | 2,880kg6,349lb | - |
| Top speed | 278 km/h 173 mph | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.1s99% target: 275 km/h / 171 mph Calculated | 75.1s99% target: 254 km/h / 158 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 5.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.5s Calculated | 19.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | 14L/100 km16.8mpg US20.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.2L/100 km14.5mpg US17.4mpg UK | 20.7L/100 km11.4mpg US13.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 13.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 230hp/t172kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated | 200hp/t149kW/t91hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 323Nm/t216lb-ft/ton Calculated | 266Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 739km459mi Calculated | 664km413mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,806cc293cu in | 6,417cc392cu in |
| Length | 4,846mm191in | 4,846mm191in |
| Width | 1,939mm76in | 1,954mm77in |
| Height | 1,705mm67in | 1,749mm69in |
| Wheelbase | 2,895mm114in | 2,915mm115in |
| Front track | 1,655mm65in | 1,618mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,669mm66in | 1,633mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 215mm8in | 211mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 670L | 457L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,780L | 1,554L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 93L |
| CO2 emissions | 270g/km | 327g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8: Power / Torque
- Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 SRT8 6.4 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,250-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT8 6.4 V8 | 6,250 rpm | 4,100 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT8 6.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 5.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.5 s | 19.4 s |
| Top speed | 278 km/h 173 mph | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 11.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 13.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 183 km/h 114 mph | 171 km/h 106 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 500 hp 373 kW |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT8 6.4 V8 | 468 hp 349 kW |
Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8 has 32 hp more than Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 SRT8 6.4 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 SRT8 6.4 V8 and Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8: 32 hp (24 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT8 6.4 V8 | 624 Nm 460 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 2,170 kg 4,784 lb |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT8 6.4 V8 | 2,342 kg 5,163 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 278 km/h 173 mph |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT8 6.4 V8 | 257 km/h 160 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 4.7 s |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT8 6.4 V8 | 5.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8 and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 SRT8 6.4 V8: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT8 6.4 V8 | 14.0 L/100 km 16.8 mpg US 20.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8 and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 SRT8 6.4 V8: 2.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT8 6.4 V8 | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 739 km 459 mi |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT8 6.4 V8 | 664 km 413 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 500 hp 373 kW | 4.7 s | 278 km/h 173 mph |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT8 6.4 V8 | 468 hp 349 kW | 5.0 s | 257 km/h 160 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT8 6.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 |
| 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT8 6.4 V8 |
| 14.0 L/100 km 16.8 mpg US 20.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT8 6.4 V8 | 14.0 L/100 km 16.8 mpg US 20.2 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT8 6.4 V8 | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 14.0 L/100 km 16.8 mpg US 20.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT8 6.4 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 500 hp 373 kW | 468 hp 349 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | 624 Nm 460 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 5.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 278 km/h 173 mph | 257 km/h 160 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,170 kg 4,784 lb | 2,342 kg 5,163 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 14.0 L/100 km 16.8 mpg US 20.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 739 km 459 mi | 664 km 413 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 270 g/km | 327 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 670 L 23.7 cu ft | 457 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8 | Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 SRT8 6.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK | 14 L/100 km16.8 mpg US20.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.13 LC100 km | 24.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi | 39.43 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal | 2,100 L555 US gal462 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,019 LC/year | 3,675 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8
- Has 32 hp more
- Has 76 Nm more
- Is 172 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 21 km/h (13 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 31 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 75 km (47 mi) more estimated range
- Has 213 L more trunk volume
- Emits 57 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 SRT8 6.4 V8
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























