Car comparison

Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8vsJeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2013 SRT8 6.4 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Porsche Cayenne II

Turbo 4.8 V8

500 hp4806 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2010-2014
VS

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2013

SRT8 6.4 V8

468 hp6417 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2013-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    278 km/h
    173 mph
  • Most powerful
    500 hp
    373 kW
  • Highest torque
    700 Nm
    516 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    2,170 kg
    4,784 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    230 hp/t
    172 kW/t
    4.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.5 L/100 km
    20.5 mpg US
    24.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    16.2 L/100 km
    14.5 mpg US
    17.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.8 L/100 km
    26.7 mpg US
    32.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    270 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    739 km
    459 mi
  • Largest trunk
    670 L
  • Best overall score
    85/100
  • Best performance score
    82/100
  • Best economy score
    76/100
  • Best practicality score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelPorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT8 6.4 V8
Power
500hp373kW
468hp349kW
Torque
700Nm516lb-ft
624Nm460lb-ft
Curb weight
2,170kg4,784lb
2,342kg5,163lb
Gross weight
2,880kg6,349lb
-
Top speed
278 km/h
173 mph
257 km/h
160 mph
To 99% top speed
67.1s99% target: 275 km/h / 171 mph
Calculated
75.1s99% target: 254 km/h / 158 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.7s
5.0s
0-200 km/h
15.5s
Calculated
19.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.5s
Calculated
4.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
14L/100 km16.8mpg US20.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
16.2L/100 km14.5mpg US17.4mpg UK
20.7L/100 km11.4mpg US13.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.8s
Calculated
13.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
230hp/t172kW/t105hp/1000 lb
Calculated
200hp/t149kW/t91hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
323Nm/t216lb-ft/ton
Calculated
266Nm/t178lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
739km459mi
Calculated
664km413mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,806cc293cu in
6,417cc392cu in
Length
4,846mm191in
4,846mm191in
Width
1,939mm76in
1,954mm77in
Height
1,705mm67in
1,749mm69in
Wheelbase
2,895mm114in
2,915mm115in
Front track
1,655mm65in
1,618mm64in
Rear track
1,669mm66in
1,633mm64in
Ground clearance
215mm8in
211mm8in
Trunk volume
670L
457L
Max trunk volume
1,780L
1,554L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
85L
93L
CO2 emissions
270g/km
327g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 SRT8 6.4 V8PowerTorque
  • Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8: Power / Torque
  • Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 SRT8 6.4 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V86,000 rpm2,250-4,500 rpm6,250 rpm
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT8 6.4 V86,250 rpm4,100 rpm6,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricPorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT8 6.4 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.5 s
4.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.7 s
5.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
15.5 s
19.4 s
Top speed
278 km/h
173 mph
257 km/h
160 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.6 s
5.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.4 s
8.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.8 s
11.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.8 s
13.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
183 km/h
114 mph
171 km/h
106 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8 has 32 hp more than Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 SRT8 6.4 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 SRT8 6.4 V8 and Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8: 32 hp (24 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT8 6.4 V8
624 Nm
460 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8
2,170 kg
4,784 lb
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT8 6.4 V8
2,342 kg
5,163 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8
278 km/h
173 mph
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT8 6.4 V8
257 km/h
160 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8 and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 SRT8 6.4 V8: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT8 6.4 V8
14.0 L/100 km
16.8 mpg US
20.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8 and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 SRT8 6.4 V8: 2.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8
230 hp/t
172 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT8 6.4 V8
200 hp/t
149 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8
500 hp
373 kW
4.7 s
278 km/h
173 mph
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT8 6.4 V8
468 hp
349 kW
5.0 s
257 km/h
160 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8
Power
500 hp
373 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
278 km/h
173 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
670 L
23.7 cu ft
Length
4,846 mm
190.8 in
Height
1,705 mm
67.1 in
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT8 6.4 V8
Power
468 hp
349 kW
0-100 km/h5.0 s
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
457 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,846 mm
190.8 in
Height
1,749 mm
68.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8
Power
500 hp
373 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
278 km/h
173 mph
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT8 6.4 V8
Power
468 hp
349 kW
0-100 km/h5.0 s
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
14.0 L/100 km
16.8 mpg US
20.2 mpg UK

Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
4.7 s
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT8 6.4 V8
14.0 L/100 km
16.8 mpg US
20.2 mpg UK
5.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8
230 hp/t
172 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT8 6.4 V8
200 hp/t
149 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp
14.0 L/100 km
16.8 mpg US
20.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehiclePorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT8 6.4 V8
Power
500 hp
373 kW
468 hp
349 kW
Torque
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
624 Nm
460 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.7 s
5.0 s
Top speed
278 km/h
173 mph
257 km/h
160 mph
Lightness
2,170 kg
4,784 lb
2,342 kg
5,163 lb
Fuel consumption
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
14.0 L/100 km
16.8 mpg US
20.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
670 L
23.7 cu ft
Length
4,846 mm
190.8 in
Height
1,705 mm
67.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
457 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,846 mm
190.8 in
Height
1,749 mm
68.9 in
Range score
739 km
459 mi
664 km
413 mi
CO2 score
270 g/km
327 g/km
Trunk score
670 L
23.7 cu ft
457 L
16.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
230 hp/t
172 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
200 hp/t
149 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehiclePorsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 SRT8 6.4 V8
Consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK14 L/100 km16.8 mpg US20.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.13 LC100 km24.50 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi32.39 LC100 mi39.43 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal2,100 L555 US gal462 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,019 LC/year3,675 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8

  • Has 32 hp more
  • Has 76 Nm more
  • Is 172 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 21 km/h (13 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 31 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 75 km (47 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 213 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 57 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) SRT8 6.4 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2013 SRT8 6.4 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster