Car comparison

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2013 SRT8 6.4 V8vsMercedes-Benz GL (X166) GL 500

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2013

SRT8 6.4 V8

468 hp6417 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2013-2017
VS

Mercedes-Benz GL (X166)

GL 500

435 hp4663 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2012-2015

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) GL 500

  • Highest torque
    700 Nm
    516 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.5 L/100 km
    20.5 mpg US
    24.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    14.8 L/100 km
    15.9 mpg US
    19.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    9.6 L/100 km
    24.5 mpg US
    29.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    269 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    870 km
    540 mi
  • Largest trunk
    680 L
  • Best overall score
    79/100
  • Best economy score
    76/100
  • Best practicality score
    93/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT8 6.4 V8Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 500
Power
468hp349kW
435hp324kW
Torque
624Nm460lb-ft
700Nm516lb-ft
Curb weight
2,342kg5,163lb
2,370kg5,225lb
Gross weight-
3,250kg7,165lb
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
250 km/h
155 mph
To 99% top speed
75.1s99% target: 254 km/h / 158 mph
Calculated
86.9s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.0s
5.4s
0-200 km/h
19.4s
Calculated
23.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.7s
Calculated
5.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
14L/100 km16.8mpg US20.2mpg UK
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
20.7L/100 km11.4mpg US13.6mpg UK
14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK
9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.2s
Calculated
13.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
200hp/t149kW/t91hp/1000 lb
Calculated
184hp/t137kW/t83hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
266Nm/t178lb-ft/ton
Calculated
295Nm/t198lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
664km413mi
Calculated
870km540mi
Calculated
Displacement
6,417cc392cu in
4,663cc285cu in
Length
4,846mm191in
5,120mm202in
Width
1,954mm77in
1,934mm76in
Height
1,749mm69in
1,850mm73in
Wheelbase
2,915mm115in
3,075mm121in
Front track
1,618mm64in
1,655mm65in
Rear track
1,633mm64in
1,675mm66in
Ground clearance
211mm8in
-
Trunk volume
457L
680L
Max trunk volume
1,554L
2,300L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Fuel tank
93L
100L
CO2 emissions
327g/km
269g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 SRT8 6.4 V8Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) GL 500PowerTorque
  • Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 SRT8 6.4 V8: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) GL 500: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT8 6.4 V86,250 rpm4,100 rpm6,500 rpm
Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 5005,250 rpm1,800-3,500 rpm6,300 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT8 6.4 V8Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 500
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.7 s
5.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.0 s
5.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
19.4 s
23.0 s
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
250 km/h
155 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.7 s
5.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.6 s
8.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.1 s
11.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.2 s
13.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
171 km/h
106 mph
164 km/h
102 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 SRT8 6.4 V8 has 33 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) GL 500.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) GL 500 and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 SRT8 6.4 V8: 33 hp (25 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT8 6.4 V8
624 Nm
460 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 500
700 Nm
516 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT8 6.4 V8
2,342 kg
5,163 lb
Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 500
2,370 kg
5,225 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT8 6.4 V8
257 km/h
160 mph
Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 500
250 km/h
155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 SRT8 6.4 V8 and Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) GL 500: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT8 6.4 V8
14.0 L/100 km
16.8 mpg US
20.2 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 500
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) GL 500 and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 SRT8 6.4 V8: 2.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT8 6.4 V8
200 hp/t
149 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 500
184 hp/t
137 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT8 6.4 V8
468 hp
349 kW
5.0 s
257 km/h
160 mph
Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 500
435 hp
324 kW
5.4 s
250 km/h
155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT8 6.4 V8
Power
468 hp
349 kW
0-100 km/h5.0 s
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
457 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,846 mm
190.8 in
Height
1,749 mm
68.9 in
Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 500
Power
435 hp
324 kW
0-100 km/h5.4 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
680 L
24.0 cu ft
Length
5,120 mm
201.6 in
Height
1,850 mm
72.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT8 6.4 V8
Power
468 hp
349 kW
0-100 km/h5.0 s
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
14.0 L/100 km
16.8 mpg US
20.2 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 500
Power
435 hp
324 kW
0-100 km/h5.4 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) GL 500 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT8 6.4 V8
14.0 L/100 km
16.8 mpg US
20.2 mpg UK
5.0 s
Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 500
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
5.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT8 6.4 V8
200 hp/t
149 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp
14.0 L/100 km
16.8 mpg US
20.2 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 500
184 hp/t
137 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT8 6.4 V8Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 500
Power
468 hp
349 kW
435 hp
324 kW
Torque
624 Nm
460 lb-ft
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.0 s
5.4 s
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
250 km/h
155 mph
Lightness
2,342 kg
5,163 lb
2,370 kg
5,225 lb
Fuel consumption
14.0 L/100 km
16.8 mpg US
20.2 mpg UK
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
457 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,846 mm
190.8 in
Height
1,749 mm
68.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
680 L
24.0 cu ft
Length
5,120 mm
201.6 in
Height
1,850 mm
72.8 in
Range score
664 km
413 mi
870 km
540 mi
CO2 score
327 g/km
269 g/km
Trunk score
457 L
16.1 cu ft
680 L
24.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
200 hp/t
149 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp
184 hp/t
137 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 SRT8 6.4 V8Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) GL 500
Consumption14 L/100 km16.8 mpg US20.2 mpg UK11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km24.50 LC100 km20.13 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi39.43 LC100 mi32.39 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,100 L555 US gal462 UK gal1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,675 LC/year3,019 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 SRT8 6.4 V8

  • Has 33 hp more
  • Is 28 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) GL 500

  • Has 76 Nm more
  • Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 205 km (128 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 223 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 58 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) SRT8 6.4 V8
Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) GL 500
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2013 SRT8 6.4 V8 vs Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) GL 500 - car comparison - FastVsFaster