Car comparison

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6vsJeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2017 5.7 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 T6

310 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbo + superchargedSUV2017-2018
VS

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2017

5.7 V8

352 hp5654 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,941 kg
    4,279 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    160 hp/t
    119 kW/t
    6.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.8 L/100 km
    30.2 mpg US
    36.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.5 L/100 km
    24.8 mpg US
    29.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.8 L/100 km
    34.6 mpg US
    41.5 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    910 km
    566 mi
  • Best overall score
    69/100
  • Best performance score
    61/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20175.7 V8
Power
310hp231kW
352hp262kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
520Nm384lb-ft
Curb weight
1,941kg4,279lb
2,424kg5,344lb
Gross weight
2,450kg5,401lb
2,949kg6,501lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
70.3s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
106.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.9s
7.3s
0-200 km/h
23.6s
Calculated
34.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.6s
Calculated
6.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
19.6L/100 km12mpg US14.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.1s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
160hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb
Calculated
145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton
Calculated
215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
910km566mi
Calculated
719km447mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
5,654cc345cu in
Length
4,688mm185in
4,828mm190in
Width
1,902mm75in
1,943mm76in
Height
1,658mm65in
1,802mm71in
Wheelbase
2,865mm113in
2,915mm115in
Front track
1,668mm66in
1,628mm64in
Rear track
1,673mm66in
1,634mm64in
Ground clearance
216mm9in
270mm11in
Trunk volume
505L
800L
Max trunk volume
1,432L
1,689L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
71L
94L
CO2 emissions
181g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 5.7 V8PowerTorque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
  • Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 5.7 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T65,700 rpm2,200-5,100 rpm5,950 rpm
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20175.7 V85,200 rpm4,200 rpm5,800 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20175.7 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.6 s
6.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.9 s
7.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.6 s
34.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.2 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.1 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
163 km/h
102 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
310 hp
231 kW
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20175.7 V8
352 hp
262 kW

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 5.7 V8 has 42 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 5.7 V8: 42 hp (31 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20175.7 V8
520 Nm
384 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
1,941 kg
4,279 lb
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20175.7 V8
2,424 kg
5,344 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20175.7 V8
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T65.9 s
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20175.7 V87.3 s

Although Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 5.7 V8 has more power, Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 5.7 V8: 1.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20175.7 V8
13.0 L/100 km
18.1 mpg US
21.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 5.7 V8: 5.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
160 hp/t
119 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20175.7 V8
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
910 km
566 mi
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20175.7 V8
719 km
447 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
310 hp
231 kW
5.9 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20175.7 V8
352 hp
262 kW
7.3 s
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20175.7 V8
Power
352 hp
262 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
800 L
28.3 cu ft
Length
4,828 mm
190.1 in
Height
1,802 mm
70.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20175.7 V8
Power
352 hp
262 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
13.0 L/100 km
18.1 mpg US
21.7 mpg UK

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
5.9 s
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20175.7 V8
13.0 L/100 km
18.1 mpg US
21.7 mpg UK
7.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
160 hp/t
119 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20175.7 V8
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
13.0 L/100 km
18.1 mpg US
21.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20175.7 V8
Power
310 hp
231 kW
352 hp
262 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
520 Nm
384 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.9 s
7.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Lightness
1,941 kg
4,279 lb
2,424 kg
5,344 lb
Fuel consumption
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
13.0 L/100 km
18.1 mpg US
21.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
800 L
28.3 cu ft
Length
4,828 mm
190.1 in
Height
1,802 mm
70.9 in
Range score
910 km
566 mi
719 km
447 mi
CO2 score
181 g/km
-
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
800 L
28.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
160 hp/t
119 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T6Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 5.7 V8
Consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK13 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.65 LC100 km22.75 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.97 LC100 mi36.61 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal1,950 L515 US gal429 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,048 LC/year3,413 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6

  • Is 483 kg lighter
  • Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 5.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 191 km (119 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) 5.7 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T6
2.0 T6
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
5.7 V8
570 V8
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20175.7 V8vsLexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8
2.0 T6
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
5.7 V8
GLS 400
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20175.7 V8vsMercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400
2.0 T6
2.0t
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsJaguarF-Pace2.0t
5.7 V8
75D 75 kWh
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20175.7 V8vsTeslaModel X75D 75 kWh
2.0 T6
3.0 TDI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI
5.7 V8
3.0 V6 TSI
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20175.7 V8vsVolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI
2.0 T6
4.4 V8
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8
5.7 V8
40i
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20175.7 V8vsBMWX7 (G07)40i
2.0 T6
40d
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsBMWX6 (F16)40d
5.7 V8
3.6
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20175.7 V8vsCadillacXT53.6
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2017 5.7 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster