Car comparison

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6vsJeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2013 5.7 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo XC90 II

2.0 T6

320 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbo + superchargedSUV2015-2017
VS

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2013

5.7 V8

352 hp5654 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2013-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    2,078 kg
    4,581 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    154 hp/t
    115 kW/t
    6.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.0 L/100 km
    29.4 mpg US
    35.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.8 L/100 km
    24.0 mpg US
    28.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.0 L/100 km
    33.6 mpg US
    40.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    186 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    888 km
    551 mi
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    59/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20135.7 V8
Power
320hp239kW
352hp262kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
520Nm384lb-ft
Curb weight
2,078kg4,581lb
2,499kg5,509lb
Gross weight
2,750kg6,063lb
2,949kg6,501lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
84.5s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
108.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.5s
7.3s
0-200 km/h
27.3s
Calculated
35.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.2s
Calculated
6.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
19.6L/100 km12mpg US14.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb
Calculated
141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
888km551mi
Calculated
715km445mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
5,654cc345cu in
Length
4,950mm195in
4,828mm190in
Width
1,923mm76in
1,943mm76in
Height
1,776mm70in
1,802mm71in
Wheelbase
2,984mm117in
2,915mm115in
Front track
1,676mm66in
1,628mm64in
Rear track
1,679mm66in
1,634mm64in
Ground clearance
238mm9in
264mm10in
Trunk volume
368L
457L
Max trunk volume
1,886L
1,554L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
71L
93L
CO2 emissions
186g/km
304g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 5.7 V8PowerTorque
  • Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
  • Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 5.7 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T65,700 rpm2,200-5,400 rpm5,950 rpm
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20135.7 V85,200 rpm4,200 rpm5,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20135.7 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.2 s
6.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.5 s
7.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
27.3 s
35.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.5 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.3 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
157 km/h
97 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
320 hp
239 kW
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20135.7 V8
352 hp
262 kW

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 5.7 V8 has 32 hp more than Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 5.7 V8: 32 hp (24 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20135.7 V8
520 Nm
384 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
2,078 kg
4,581 lb
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20135.7 V8
2,499 kg
5,509 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20135.7 V8
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T66.5 s
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20135.7 V87.3 s

Although Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 5.7 V8 has more power, Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 5.7 V8: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20135.7 V8
13.0 L/100 km
18.1 mpg US
21.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 5.7 V8: 5.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20135.7 V8
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
888 km
551 mi
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20135.7 V8
715 km
445 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
320 hp
239 kW
6.5 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20135.7 V8
352 hp
262 kW
7.3 s
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
Power
320 hp
239 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
368 L
13.0 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20135.7 V8
Power
352 hp
262 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
457 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,828 mm
190.1 in
Height
1,802 mm
70.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
Power
320 hp
239 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20135.7 V8
Power
352 hp
262 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
13.0 L/100 km
18.1 mpg US
21.7 mpg UK

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
6.5 s
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20135.7 V8
13.0 L/100 km
18.1 mpg US
21.7 mpg UK
7.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20135.7 V8
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
13.0 L/100 km
18.1 mpg US
21.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20135.7 V8
Power
320 hp
239 kW
352 hp
262 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
520 Nm
384 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.5 s
7.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Lightness
2,078 kg
4,581 lb
2,499 kg
5,509 lb
Fuel consumption
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
13.0 L/100 km
18.1 mpg US
21.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
368 L
13.0 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
457 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,828 mm
190.1 in
Height
1,802 mm
70.9 in
Range score
888 km
551 mi
715 km
445 mi
CO2 score
186 g/km
304 g/km
Trunk score
368 L
13.0 cu ft
457 L
16.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T6Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 5.7 V8
Consumption8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK13 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.00 LC100 km22.75 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.53 LC100 mi36.61 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal1,950 L515 US gal429 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,100 LC/year3,413 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6

  • Is 421 kg lighter
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 5.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 172 km (107 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 118 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 5.7 V8

  • Has 32 hp more
  • Has 120 Nm more
  • Has 89 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) 5.7 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T6
4.4 V8
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8
5.7 V8
GL 400
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20135.7 V8vsMercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 400
2.0 T6
2.0 T6
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
5.7 V8
3.0 V6 TSI
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20135.7 V8vsVolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI
5.7 V8
3.0 V6 GDI
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20135.7 V8vsMaseratiLevante3.0 V6 GDI
2.0 T6
35i
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsBMWX6 (F16)35i
5.7 V8
GLS 400
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20135.7 V8vsMercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400
2.0 T6
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
5.7 V8
570 V8
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20135.7 V8vsLexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8
5.7 V8
3.6 V6
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20135.7 V8vsPorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6
2.0 T6
3.0d V6
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsJaguarF-Pace3.0d V6
5.7 V8
4.2 FSI V8
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20135.7 V8vsVolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 FSI V8
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2013 5.7 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster