Car comparison

Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) · Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8vsWiesmann GT MF5 4.4 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) · Facelift 2011

R-S 5.0 V8

550 hp5000 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSuperchargedCoupe2011-2014
VS

Wiesmann GT MF5

4.4 V8

555 hp4395 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2009-2014

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8

  • Fastest top speed
    315 km/h
    196 mph Unrestricted
    300 km/h
    186 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    680 Nm
    502 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    12.3 L/100 km
    19.1 mpg US
    23.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.6 L/100 km
    27.4 mpg US
    32.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    574 km
    357 mi
  • Best overall score
    75/100
  • Best economy score
    74/100
  • Best practicality score
    48/100

Wiesmann GT MF5 4.4 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.9 s
  • Most powerful
    555 hp
    414 kW
  • Lightest
    1,470 kg
    3,241 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    378 hp/t
    282 kW/t
    2.6 kg/hp
  • Lowest city consumption
    18.7 L/100 km
    12.6 mpg US
    15.1 mpg UK
  • Best performance score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8
Power
550hp410kW
555hp414kW
Torque
680Nm502lb-ft
680Nm502lb-ft
Curb weight
1,753kg3,865lb
1,470kg3,241lb
Gross weight
2,145kg4,729lb
1,680kg3,704lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Calculated
311 km/h
193 mph
To 99% top speed
66.0s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
50.4s99% target: 308 km/h / 191 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.4s
3.9s
0-200 km/h
12.6s
Calculated
10.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.2s
Calculated
3.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK
12.9L/100 km18.2mpg US21.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
18.9L/100 km12.4mpg US14.9mpg UK
18.7L/100 km12.6mpg US15.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.2s
Calculated
11.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
314hp/t234kW/t142hp/1000 lb
Calculated
378hp/t282kW/t171hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
388Nm/t260lb-ft/ton
Calculated
463Nm/t310lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
574km357mi
Calculated
543km337mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,000cc305cu in
4,395cc268cu in
Length
4,804mm189in
4,220mm166in
Width-
1,950mm77in
Height
1,312mm52in
1,180mm46in
Wheelbase
2,752mm108in
2,507mm99in
Ground clearance
100mm4in
-
Trunk volume
330L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
2
Fuel tank
71L
70L
CO2 emissions-
299g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8Wiesmann GT MF5 4.4 V8PowerTorque
  • Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
  • Wiesmann GT MF5 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V86,000-6,500 rpm2,500-5,500 rpm6,750 rpm
WiesmannGT MF54.4 V85,750-6,250 rpm1,500-5,650 rpm6,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.2 s
3.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.4 s
3.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
12.6 s
10.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Limited
311 km/h
193 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.5 s
5.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.1 s
7.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.4 s
9.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.2 s
11.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
197 km/h
122 mph
209 km/h
130 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
550 hp
410 kW
WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8
555 hp
414 kW

Wiesmann GT MF5 4.4 V8 has 5 hp more than Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 and Wiesmann GT MF5 4.4 V8: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
680 Nm
502 lb-ft
WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8
680 Nm
502 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
1,753 kg
3,865 lb
WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8
1,470 kg
3,241 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8
311 km/h
193 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V84.4 s
WiesmannGT MF54.4 V83.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Wiesmann GT MF5 4.4 V8 and Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK
WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8
12.9 L/100 km
18.2 mpg US
21.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 and Wiesmann GT MF5 4.4 V8: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
314 hp/t
234 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8
378 hp/t
282 kW/t
2.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
574 km
357 mi
WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8
543 km
337 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
550 hp
410 kW
4.4 s
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8
555 hp
414 kW
3.9 s
311 km/h
193 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,804 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,312 mm
51.7 in
WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8
Power
555 hp
414 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
311 km/h
193 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,220 mm
166.1 in
Height
1,180 mm
46.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK
WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8
Power
555 hp
414 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
311 km/h
193 mph
12.9 L/100 km
18.2 mpg US
21.9 mpg UK

Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK
4.4 s
WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8
12.9 L/100 km
18.2 mpg US
21.9 mpg UK
3.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
314 hp/t
234 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK
WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8
378 hp/t
282 kW/t
2.6 kg/hp
12.9 L/100 km
18.2 mpg US
21.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
555 hp
414 kW
Torque
680 Nm
502 lb-ft
680 Nm
502 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.4 s
3.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
311 km/h
193 mph
Lightness
1,753 kg
3,865 lb
1,470 kg
3,241 lb
Fuel consumption
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK
12.9 L/100 km
18.2 mpg US
21.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,804 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,312 mm
51.7 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,220 mm
166.1 in
Height
1,180 mm
46.5 in
Range score
574 km
357 mi
543 km
337 mi
CO2 score
-
299 g/km
Trunk score
330 L
11.7 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
314 hp/t
234 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
378 hp/t
282 kW/t
2.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8Wiesmann GT MF5 4.4 V8
Consumption12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK12.9 L/100 km18.2 mpg US21.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km21.53 LC100 km22.58 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi34.64 LC100 mi36.33 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal1,935 L511 US gal426 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,229 LC/year3,386 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8

  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 31 km (19 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Wiesmann GT MF5 4.4 V8

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Is 283 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 64 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) R-S 5.0 V8
Wiesmann GT MF5 4.4 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

R-S 5.0 V8
R 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8vsJaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
4.4 V8
5.2 V10
VS
WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8vsLamborghiniGallardo LP 550-25.2 V10
R-S 5.0 V8
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8vsJaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
4.4 V8
GT 5.2 V10
VS
WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8vsAUDIR8 Coupe (42)GT 5.2 V10
R-S 5.0 V8
R 4.2 V8
VS
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8vsJaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8
4.4 V8
6.2 V8
VS
WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8vsMercedes-BenzSLS AMG Coupe (C197)6.2 V8
R-S 5.0 V8
R 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8vsJaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
4.4 V8
5.2i V10
VS
WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8vsLamborghiniGallardo LP 560-45.2i V10
R-S 5.0 V8
R 4.2 V8
VS
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8vsJaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8
4.4 V8
Super Trofeo Stradale 5.2
VS
WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8vsLamborghiniGallardo LP 570-4Super Trofeo Stradale 5.2
R-S 5.0 V8
R 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8vsJaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V8
4.4 V8
4.8 V10
VS
WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8vsLexusLFA4.8 V10
Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) · Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 vs Wiesmann GT MF5 4.4 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster