AUDI R8 Coupe (42)
Car comparison
AUDI R8 Coupe (42) GT 5.2 V10vsWiesmann GT MF5 4.4 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonWiesmann GT MF5
4.4 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Wiesmann GT MF5 4.4 V8
- Highest torque680 Nm502 lb-ft
- Lightest1,470 kg3,241 lb
- Best power-to-weight378 hp/t282 kW/t2.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.9 L/100 km18.2 mpg US21.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption18.7 L/100 km12.6 mpg US15.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions299 g/km
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score91/100
- Best economy score72/100
- Best practicality score38/100
AUDI R8 Coupe (42) GT 5.2 V10
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.6 s
- Fastest top speed320 km/h199 mph
- Most powerful560 hp418 kW
- Best estimated range647 km402 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIR8 Coupe (42)GT 5.2 V10 | WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 560hp418kW | 555hp414kW |
| Torque | 540Nm398lb-ft | 680Nm502lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,525kg3,362lb | 1,470kg3,241lb |
| Gross weight | 1,825kg4,023lb | 1,680kg3,704lb |
| Top speed | 320 km/h 199 mph | 311 km/h 193 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 53.2s99% target: 317 km/h / 197 mph Calculated | 50.1s99% target: 308 km/h / 191 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.6s | 3.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.1s Calculated | 10.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.4s Calculated | 3.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK | 12.9L/100 km18.2mpg US21.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 21L/100 km11.2mpg US13.5mpg UK | 18.7L/100 km12.6mpg US15.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.3s Calculated | 11.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 367hp/t274kW/t167hp/1000 lb Calculated | 378hp/t282kW/t171hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 354Nm/t237lb-ft/ton Calculated | 463Nm/t310lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 647km402mi Calculated | 543km337mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,204cc318cu in | 4,395cc268cu in |
| Length | 4,434mm175in | 4,220mm166in |
| Width | 1,930mm76in | 1,950mm77in |
| Height | 1,252mm49in | 1,180mm46in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | 2,507mm99in |
| Front track | 1,644mm65in | - |
| Rear track | 1,605mm63in | - |
| Trunk volume | 100L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 190L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 323g/km | 299g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI R8 Coupe (42) GT 5.2 V10: Power / Torque
- Wiesmann GT MF5 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)GT 5.2 V10 | 8,000 rpm | 6,500 rpm | 8,700 rpm |
| WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8 | 5,750-6,250 rpm | 1,500-5,650 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIR8 Coupe (42)GT 5.2 V10 | WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.4 s | 3.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.6 s | 3.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.1 s | 10.7 s |
| Top speed | 320 km/h 199 mph | 311 km/h 193 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.0 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.5 s | 7.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.5 s | 9.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.3 s | 11.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 212 km/h 132 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)GT 5.2 V10 | 560 hp 418 kW |
| WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8 | 555 hp 414 kW |
AUDI R8 Coupe (42) GT 5.2 V10 has 5 hp more than Wiesmann GT MF5 4.4 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Wiesmann GT MF5 4.4 V8 and AUDI R8 Coupe (42) GT 5.2 V10: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)GT 5.2 V10 | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft |
| WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8 | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)GT 5.2 V10 | 1,525 kg 3,362 lb |
| WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8 | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)GT 5.2 V10 | 320 km/h 199 mph |
| WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8 | 311 km/h 193 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)GT 5.2 V10 | 3.6 s |
| WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8 | 3.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI R8 Coupe (42) GT 5.2 V10 and Wiesmann GT MF5 4.4 V8: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)GT 5.2 V10 | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK |
| WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8 | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Wiesmann GT MF5 4.4 V8 and AUDI R8 Coupe (42) GT 5.2 V10: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)GT 5.2 V10 | 367 hp/t 274 kW/t 2.7 kg/hp |
| WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8 | 378 hp/t 282 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)GT 5.2 V10 | 647 km 402 mi |
| WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8 | 543 km 337 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)GT 5.2 V10 | 560 hp 418 kW | 3.6 s | 320 km/h 199 mph |
| WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8 | 555 hp 414 kW | 3.9 s | 311 km/h 193 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)GT 5.2 V10 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)GT 5.2 V10 |
| 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8 |
| 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Wiesmann GT MF5 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)GT 5.2 V10 | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | 3.6 s |
| WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8 | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)GT 5.2 V10 | 367 hp/t 274 kW/t 2.7 kg/hp | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK |
| WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8 | 378 hp/t 282 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIR8 Coupe (42)GT 5.2 V10 | WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 560 hp 418 kW | 555 hp 414 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.6 s | 3.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 320 km/h 199 mph | 311 km/h 193 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,525 kg 3,362 lb | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 647 km 402 mi | 543 km 337 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 323 g/km | 299 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 100 L 3.5 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 367 hp/t 274 kW/t 2.7 kg/hp | 378 hp/t 282 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI R8 Coupe (42) GT 5.2 V10 | Wiesmann GT MF5 4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.9 L/100 km16.9 mpg US20.3 mpg UK | 12.9 L/100 km18.2 mpg US21.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 24.33 LC100 km | 22.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 39.15 LC100 mi | 36.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,085 L551 US gal459 UK gal | 1,935 L511 US gal426 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,649 LC/year | 3,386 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI R8 Coupe (42) GT 5.2 V10
- Has 5 hp more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 105 km (65 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Wiesmann GT MF5 4.4 V8
- Has 140 Nm more
- Is 55 kg lighter
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 24 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























