Car comparison

Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0vsNissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XJS Coupe

6.0

302 hp5993 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe1993-1996
VS

Nissan 300 ZX (Z32)

3.0 Twin Turbo

283 hp2960 ccGasolineRWDManualTurbochargedCoupe1990-1995

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0

  • Fastest top speed
    270 km/h
    168 mph Unrestricted
    260 km/h
    162 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    302 hp
    225 kW
  • Highest torque
    471 Nm
    347 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    407 L
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    63/100
  • Best practicality score
    51/100

Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.9 s
  • Lightest
    1,644 kg
    3,624 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    172 hp/t
    128 kW/t
    5.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.2 L/100 km
    21.0 mpg US
    25.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    625 km
    388 mi
  • Best economy score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXJS Coupe6.0Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo
Power
302hp225kW
283hp211kW
Torque
471Nm347lb-ft
375Nm277lb-ft
Curb weight
1,860kg4,101lb
1,644kg3,624lb
Gross weight
2,210kg4,872lb
2,015kg4,442lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
101.2s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph
Calculated
84.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.8s
5.9s
0-200 km/h
23.9s
Calculated
21.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.5s
Calculated
5.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.8s
Calculated
14.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
162hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb
Calculated
172hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
253Nm/t169lb-ft/ton
Calculated
228Nm/t153lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
597km371mi
Calculated
625km388mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,993cc366cu in
2,960cc181cu in
Length
4,820mm190in
4,520mm178in
Width
1,793mm71in
1,800mm71in
Height
1,254mm49in
1,255mm49in
Wheelbase
2,588mm102in
2,570mm101in
Front track
1,489mm59in
1,495mm59in
Rear track
1,504mm59in
1,555mm61in
Trunk volume
407L
326L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
89L
70L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin TurboPowerTorque
  • Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0: Power / Torque
  • Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXJS Coupe6.05,350 rpm2,850 rpm5,600 rpm
Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo6,400 rpm3,600 rpm6,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXJS Coupe6.0Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.5 s
5.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.8 s
5.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.9 s
21.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
9.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.5 s
11.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.8 s
14.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
160 km/h
99 mph
167 km/h
104 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
302 hp
225 kW
Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo
283 hp
211 kW

Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0 has 19 hp more than Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo.

The biggest power difference is between Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo and Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0: 19 hp (14 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
471 Nm
347 lb-ft
Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo
375 Nm
277 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
1,860 kg
4,101 lb
Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo
1,644 kg
3,624 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJS Coupe6.06.8 s
Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo5.9 s

Although Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0 has more power, Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo and Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
14.9 L/100 km
15.8 mpg US
19.0 mpg UK
Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo
11.2 L/100 km
21.0 mpg US
25.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo and Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0: 3.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo
172 hp/t
128 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
597 km
371 mi
Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo
625 km
388 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
302 hp
225 kW
6.8 s
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo
283 hp
211 kW
5.9 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
Power
302 hp
225 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
407 L
14.4 cu ft
Length
4,820 mm
189.8 in
Height
1,254 mm
49.4 in
Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo
Power
283 hp
211 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
326 L
11.5 cu ft
Length
4,520 mm
178.0 in
Height
1,255 mm
49.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
Power
302 hp
225 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
14.9 L/100 km
15.8 mpg US
19.0 mpg UK
Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo
Power
283 hp
211 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
11.2 L/100 km
21.0 mpg US
25.2 mpg UK

Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
14.9 L/100 km
15.8 mpg US
19.0 mpg UK
6.8 s
Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo
11.2 L/100 km
21.0 mpg US
25.2 mpg UK
5.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
14.9 L/100 km
15.8 mpg US
19.0 mpg UK
Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo
172 hp/t
128 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
11.2 L/100 km
21.0 mpg US
25.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXJS Coupe6.0Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo
Power
302 hp
225 kW
283 hp
211 kW
Torque
471 Nm
347 lb-ft
375 Nm
277 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.8 s
5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,860 kg
4,101 lb
1,644 kg
3,624 lb
Fuel consumption
14.9 L/100 km
15.8 mpg US
19.0 mpg UK
11.2 L/100 km
21.0 mpg US
25.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
407 L
14.4 cu ft
Length
4,820 mm
189.8 in
Height
1,254 mm
49.4 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
326 L
11.5 cu ft
Length
4,520 mm
178.0 in
Height
1,255 mm
49.4 in
Range score
597 km
371 mi
625 km
388 mi
Trunk score
407 L
14.4 cu ft
326 L
11.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
172 hp/t
128 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XJS Coupe 6.0Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo
Consumption14.9 L/100 km15.8 mpg US19 mpg UK11.2 L/100 km21 mpg US25.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km26.08 LC100 km19.60 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi41.96 LC100 mi31.54 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,235 L590 US gal492 UK gal1,680 L444 US gal370 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,911 LC/year2,940 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0

  • Has 19 hp more
  • Has 96 Nm more
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 81 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo

  • Is 216 kg lighter
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 3.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 28 km (17 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0
Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

6.0
GT 3.0
VS
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0vsBMWM3 Coupe (E36)GT 3.0
3.0 Twin Turbo
3.0 Turbo
VS
Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin TurbovsNissan300 ZX (Z31)3.0 Turbo
6.0
2.0 24V Biturbo
VS
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0vsMaseratiGhibli II2.0 24V Biturbo
3.0 Twin Turbo
3.0 i 24V 4x4
VS
Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin TurbovsMitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4
6.0
850Ci 5.4
VS
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0vsBMW8 Series (E31)850Ci 5.4
6.0
CL 500 V8
VS
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0vsMercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8
3.0 Twin Turbo
3.4 i V8 32V
VS
Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin TurbovsFerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V
6.0
3.0 Twin Turbo
VS
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0vsNissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo
3.0 Twin Turbo
5.3
VS
Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin TurbovsJaguarXJS Coupe5.3
6.0
3.0 8V Turbo S
VS
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0vsPorsche9683.0 8V Turbo S
3.0 Twin Turbo
3.0 i V6 Turbo
VS
Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin TurbovsAlpineA6103.0 i V6 Turbo
3.0 Twin Turbo
5.3
VS
Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin TurbovsAston MartinVirage5.3
Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0 vs Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo - car comparison - FastVsFaster