Jaguar XJS Coupe
Car comparison
Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0vsJaguar XK Coupe (X150) 4.2 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XK Coupe (X150)
4.2 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0
- Fastest top speed270 km/h168 mph Unrestricted260 km/h162 mph Restricted
- Most powerful302 hp225 kW
- Highest torque471 Nm347 lb-ft
- Largest trunk407 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) 4.2 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Lightest1,645 kg3,627 lb
- Best power-to-weight181 hp/t135 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25.0 mpg UK
- Best estimated range629 km391 mi
- Best economy score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXJS Coupe6.0 | JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 302hp225kW | 298hp222kW |
| Torque | 471Nm347lb-ft | 411Nm303lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,860kg4,101lb | 1,645kg3,627lb |
| Gross weight | 2,210kg4,872lb | 2,035kg4,486lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 100.4s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated | 86.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 6.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.9s Calculated | 22.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 5.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 14.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 162hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 181hp/t135kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 253Nm/t169lb-ft/ton Calculated | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 597km371mi Calculated | 629km391mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,993cc366cu in | 4,196cc256cu in |
| Length | 4,820mm190in | 4,791mm189in |
| Width | 1,793mm71in | 1,892mm74in |
| Height | 1,254mm49in | 1,322mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,588mm102in | 2,752mm108in |
| Front track | 1,489mm59in | - |
| Rear track | 1,504mm59in | - |
| Ground clearance | - | 120mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 407L | 300L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 89L | 71L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) 4.2 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJS Coupe6.0 | 5,350 rpm | 2,850 rpm | 5,600 rpm |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXJS Coupe6.0 | JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 5.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.9 s | 22.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 14.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 99 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJS Coupe6.0 | 302 hp 225 kW |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 298 hp 222 kW |
Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0 has 4 hp more than Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) 4.2 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) 4.2 V8 and Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJS Coupe6.0 | 471 Nm 347 lb-ft |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 411 Nm 303 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJS Coupe6.0 | 1,860 kg 4,101 lb |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJS Coupe6.0 | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJS Coupe6.0 | 6.8 s |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 6.2 s |
Although Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0 has more power, Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) 4.2 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) 4.2 V8 and Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJS Coupe6.0 | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) 4.2 V8 and Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0: 3.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJS Coupe6.0 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJS Coupe6.0 | 597 km 371 mi |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 629 km 391 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJS Coupe6.0 | 302 hp 225 kW | 6.8 s | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 298 hp 222 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJS Coupe6.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJS Coupe6.0 |
| 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 |
| 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) 4.2 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJS Coupe6.0 | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJS Coupe6.0 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXJS Coupe6.0 | JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 302 hp 225 kW | 298 hp 222 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 471 Nm 347 lb-ft | 411 Nm 303 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 6.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,860 kg 4,101 lb | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 597 km 371 mi | 629 km 391 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 407 L 14.4 cu ft | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0 | Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) 4.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.9 L/100 km15.8 mpg US19 mpg UK | 11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 26.08 LC100 km | 19.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 41.96 LC100 mi | 31.82 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,235 L590 US gal492 UK gal | 1,695 L448 US gal373 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,911 LC/year | 2,966 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 60 Nm more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 107 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) 4.2 V8
- Is 215 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 3.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 32 km (20 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























